Editorial Policy
What we will and will not publish, and how commission is kept out of the rankings.
Independence
Mic & Mix is published by Magoo Media Group and written by Ryder M.. No manufacturer, retailer or agency has any input into what appears here, and there is no paid inclusion, sponsored placement or gifted-product arrangement behind any recommendation on this site. Nobody has been paid to appear in a table.
We earn Amazon Associates commissions when a reader buys through a link here, which creates an obvious incentive to recommend expensive things. The honest safeguards are structural rather than aspirational: rankings follow a published rubric in which value is one of five equally weighted metrics, several of our pages recommend the cheaper product, and several tell you to spend the money in a different category altogether.
The clearest test of this is the page on acoustic foam, which argues against buying a product we could easily earn on, and the page on subwoofers, which tells almost everybody not to buy one.
What we will never publish
- Invented reviews or testimonials. Not paraphrased, not composed, not “representative of feedback we receive”. There are none on this site and there never will be.
- Claimed testing we did not do. No “in our testing”, no “after six months with this microphone”, no test lab. We have not tested these products and every page says so.
- Credentials we do not hold. No audio engineering qualification, no professional studio history, no “our expert panel”. We compete on published, checkable reasoning instead.
- Specifications we cannot source. Where a manufacturer publishes nothing, we write “Not published” rather than an estimate. At least one product on this site is described qualitatively for exactly this reason.
- Prices typed into prose. Prices render only from a live data layer with a 48-hour expiry. A price in an article is wrong within weeks.
- Manufacturer product photography. Our product imagery is licensed stock of the relevant category of equipment, described honestly in the alt text. We do not re-host maker images and we do not present stock as our own room or our own gear.
How a product gets into a table
- It is a real model, currently sold, identified from research into the queries readers actually search for.
- Its decisive specification is verified against a published source, and that source URL is recorded. Without it, the product cannot be added — this is enforced in code.
- It is scored against the five metrics for its category, and the overall figure is computed from those five rather than assigned.
- It gets a written verdict that names who should not buy it. Every product card on this site has a “what it costs you” column, and none of them is empty.
What we leave out, and why we say so
Every roundup on this site carries a “what we did not pick, and why” section. That is not a formality: it is where we explain the products a reader might reasonably expect to see and the specific reason they are absent — usually unverifiable specifications, or a product that is genuinely wrong for a home studio despite being popular.
Corrections
If something here is wrong, email contact@micandmix.com. A specification correction with a source is the most useful message we can receive, and we will act on it.
- Factual errors are corrected and the page's last-updated date is changed.
- Errors that changed a recommendation get a visible note on the page saying what was wrong and when it was fixed. Quietly editing a ranking is not a correction.
- Discontinued products are removed or marked, and the table is re-ranked without them.
Refresh cadence
Quarterly, and whenever a product in a table is discontinued or replaced. Dates on this site are real. We do not bump a date without changing something, and we would rather display an honest older date than an update stamp that is not true.
Scope
We cover home recording and podcast equipment for someone upgrading from entry-level gear. We do not cover professional studio equipment, live sound, instruments, or software beyond noting that a free DAW is fine. Writing about things we have no basis for judging would undermine the parts of this site that are useful.