Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best Dynamic Microphones for Vocals

Why a dynamic beats a condenser in an untreated room, and which of the six is right for your voice and your preamp.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best Dynamic Microphones for Vocals: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Shure SM7BThe default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa8.4
2
Shure SM7dBAn SM7B with the booster problem already solved
Built-in preamp+18 dB or +28 dB8.9
3
Electro-Voice RE20Movers, leaners and anyone who cannot hold mic distance
Proximity controlContinuously Variable-D8.1
4
Rode PodMicThe best value in a broadcast dynamic
Sensitivity-57 dBV/Pa8.4
5
Audio-Technica BP40Tighter pickup than a cardioid in a live room
Polar patternHypercardioid8.6
6
Shure SM58The cheapest way to hear what a dynamic does for you
Sensitivity-54.5 dBV/Pa8.5

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The Shure SM7B is the best dynamic for vocals if your interface supplies 60 dB or more of clean gain. If it does not, the SM7dB is the same capsule with a +28 dB preamp built in, which solves the problem in one purchase rather than two.

A dynamic capsule needs real air movement to generate a signal. That is usually described as a disadvantage — it is why these microphones are quiet and need loud preamps. But it is also the single most useful property a microphone can have in a room you cannot treat, because a reflection arriving off the wall behind you has already lost most of its energy and a dynamic simply does not register it.

That is the whole argument. In a treated room a good condenser will beat any of these on detail. In a bedroom with bare walls, a dynamic sounds closer, drier and more finished, and no amount of processing gets a condenser recording in the same room back to that.

Voicing matters more here than spec sheets suggest

All six of these microphones are cardioid or hypercardioid dynamics with broadly similar bandwidth. What separates them on a voice is how they are voiced through the low-mids and the presence region, and whether they give you any control over it.

On-mic tone controls and proximity behavior. The controls column lists physical switches on the microphone body; the proximity column describes how much the tone changes as you move closer.
MicrophoneOn-mic controlsProximity behaviorSuits
Shure SM7BBass rolloff + presence boostStrong, usable deliberatelyA thin voice that wants weight, or a boomy one that needs the rolloff
Shure SM7dBSame two, plus +18/+28 dB preampStrongThe same voices, on a modest interface
Electro-Voice RE20Bass tilt-down below 400 HzEngineered out by Variable-DAnyone who moves while they talk or sing
Rode PodMicNoneStrong, with more low-mid weightA thin or bright voice; a bargain everywhere else
Audio-Technica BP40100 Hz rolloff, 6 dB/octaveStrong, and pattern is tighterA live-sounding room plus a weak preamp
Shure SM58NoneStrongFinding out whether a dynamic is the answer at all

If your voice is already bass-heavy, the SM7B's bass rolloff switch is worth more than any tonal difference between the rest. If you cannot keep a fixed distance, the RE20's Variable-D design is worth more than either. Those two facts decide this page for most people.

The six dynamics, ranked

#1

Shure SM7B

Top pick

Shure · The default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it

Buy it if your interface supplies 60 dB or more of clean gain, or if you are budgeting for a booster alongside it. Buy something else if your only interface is a Scarlett Solo and you are not prepared to add hardware.

Why it is here

  • Rejects room and computer-fan noise better than any condenser at any price
  • Two voicing switches let one mic cover a thin voice and a boomy one
  • Internal shockmount and a yoke that actually holds position on a boom arm

What it costs you

  • At -59.0 dBV/Pa it is one of the quietest mics sold, so it demands a loud preamp
  • Total cost is the mic plus, very often, a booster
  • Heavy enough that a cheap desk arm will droop under it
Published specifications for the Shure SM7B, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa (1.12 mV)spec
Output impedance150 ohmsspec
Voicing controlsBass rolloff and presence boost switchesspec
#2

Shure SM7dB

Shure · An SM7B with the booster problem already solved

The right SM7 for anyone whose interface tops out near 55 dB and who wants one purchase instead of two. Skip it if you already own a Cloudlifter or a 69 dB-gain interface, because you are paying twice for the same 25 dB.

Why it is here

  • The +28 dB setting turns a 55 dB-gain interface into enough headroom for this capsule
  • One XLR cable, no inline box, no second phantom-power dependency to reason about
  • Bypassable, so it behaves as a plain SM7B when you move it to a big preamp

What it costs you

  • You pay for the preamp whether your interface needed it or not
  • A separate booster can be reused with other low-output mics; this one cannot
  • No gain setting between +18 dB and +28 dB
Published specifications for the Shure SM7dB, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioid, activespec
Frequency response50 Hz to 20,000 Hzspec
Preamp boostSelectable +18 dB or +28 dBspec
BypassPreamp can be switched out for original SM7B behaviorspec
#3

Electro-Voice RE20

Electro-Voice · Movers, leaners and anyone who cannot hold mic distance

Worth the premium if you move while you talk, gesture, or share a mic with someone whose technique you cannot control. If you sit still at a fixed distance, the SM7B's proximity effect is a feature you will use, not a problem you need engineered away.

Why it is here

  • Variable-D means the tone barely changes as you drift closer to or further from the grille
  • Integral blast filter handles close talking without a separate pop screen
  • The bass tilt-down switch is a genuinely useful second voicing, not a gimmick

What it costs you

  • Costs more than an SM7B while sounding less immediately flattering on most voices
  • Same low-output problem as every broadcast dynamic
  • Large and beige, which some people mind
Published specifications for the Electro-Voice RE20, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioid, Variable-Dspec
Frequency response45 Hz to 18 kHzspec
Sensitivity1.5 mV/Paspec
Impedance150 ohms balancedspec
FilterBass tilt-down switch, approx. 2.25 dB/octave below 400 Hzspec
#4

Rode PodMic

Rode · The best value in a broadcast dynamic

The pick for most people upgrading from a USB mic: it gets you 90 percent of the broadcast-dynamic sound without the booster arithmetic. Choose the SM7B instead if your voice is already bass-heavy and you want the bass-rolloff switch.

Why it is here

  • At -57 dBV/Pa it needs about 2 dB less gain than an SM7B, which is enough to matter on a 58 dB interface
  • Internal pop filter means one less thing clamped to your arm
  • All-metal body at a fraction of the SM7B's price

What it costs you

  • Voiced with more low-mid weight than the SM7B, so a boomy voice can get boomier
  • No voicing switches, so you fix tone in the DAW rather than on the mic
  • Still low enough output that a 55 dB interface will be working hard
Published specifications for the Rode PodMic, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-57 dB re 1 V/Pa (1.60 mV at 94 dB SPL)spec
Frequency range20 Hz to 20 kHzspec
Output impedance320 ohmsspec
Built inInternal pop filter and internal shockmountspec
#5

Audio-Technica BP40

Audio-Technica · Tighter pickup than a cardioid in a live room

The pick when your problem is a live-sounding room and a weak preamp at the same time: the narrow pattern and the hot output solve both. Avoid it if you or your guests cannot stay on-axis.

Why it is here

  • At -48 dB it is dramatically hotter than an SM7B and needs no booster on anything modern
  • Hypercardioid pattern narrows the pickup further than the cardioid competition
  • Switchable 100 Hz rolloff at 6 dB/octave for close work

What it costs you

  • 632 g needs a serious arm or stand
  • Hypercardioid punishes sloppy mic technique — step off-axis and you vanish
  • Voiced large and forward, which is not every voice's friend
Published specifications for the Audio-Technica BP40, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, hypercardioid, 37 mm capsulespec
Sensitivity-48 dB (3.9 mV) re 1 V at 1 Paspec
Frequency response50 Hz to 16,000 Hzspec
Impedance450 ohmsspec
Weight632 gspec
#6

Shure SM58

Shure · The cheapest way to hear what a dynamic does for you

The right first XLR mic if the real question is whether a dynamic fixes your room, because it answers that for very little money on the interface you already own. It is a diagnostic, not a destination.

Why it is here

  • At -54.5 dBV/Pa it is the hottest dynamic here, and works on genuinely modest preamps
  • Light enough for any stand or arm you already own
  • Effectively indestructible, and resells for most of what you paid

What it costs you

  • Response stops at 15 kHz and it is voiced for a PA, not a studio
  • Handheld grille shape is awkward on a desk boom
  • You will outgrow it if voice is your main output
Published specifications for the Shure SM58, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-54.5 dBV/Pa (1.85 mV) at 1 kHzspec
Frequency response50 Hz to 15,000 Hzspec
Rated impedance150 ohmsspec
Net weight298 gspec

What we did not pick, and why

  • Ribbon microphones. Genuinely lovely on some voices, and genuinely a bad first purchase: they are even quieter than these, they are fragile, and a phantom-power mistake can destroy one. If you go there, read the phantom-power behavior in Cloudlifter vs FetHead before you plug anything in.
  • The Rode Procaster. A capable broadcast dynamic, but we could not verify its published sensitivity from a manufacturer source in this pass, and the whole ranking here turns on that figure. We would rather leave it off than print a number we cannot cite.
  • Handheld stage dynamics other than the SM58. They are designed to survive being dropped and to reject feedback, not to sound good eight inches from a desk. The SM58 is here as a deliberately cheap diagnostic, not as a recommendation to buy a stage mic for a studio.

Pair it with

  • Gain, before anything else. Five of these six want more than a budget interface supplies. How much clean gain do you need lists which interfaces reach which figure.
  • A reflection filter if you cannot treat the room. Best reflection filters — a dynamic plus a shield is a genuinely workable vocal setup in a rented room.
  • A stand that holds the weight. The BP40 is 632 g. Best mic stands covers what that means in practice.

How to choose

  1. Look up your interface's published maximum mic gain. Everything else is downstream of that number.
  2. If it is 60 dB or more, choose on voicing: SM7B for control, PodMic for value, RE20 for movement.
  3. If it is 55-58 dB, either add a booster (about the cost of the gap) or buy the SM7dB and be done.
  4. If it is under 55 dB or unpublished, buy the BP40 or the SM58 — both are hot enough to work on anything.
  5. If you share the microphone with guests, avoid the BP40's hypercardioid pattern and pick a cardioid.
A broadcast-style dynamic microphone on a desk boom arm in a home studio
Dynamics reward close work — most of these are voiced to be used at a hand's width. Illustrative photography.

Questions people actually ask

Why do dynamic microphones need so much gain?
Because the capsule is passive: sound moves a coil in a magnetic field and the resulting voltage is all you get. A condenser has phantom power and active electronics behind it, so it produces far more output for the same sound. That is also why dynamics reject your room and condensers do not.
Is a dynamic microphone good for singing?
Yes, particularly in an untreated room. A great deal of commercial vocal recording is done on dynamics. What you give up is some top-end air and transient detail; what you gain is a recording with far less room in it, which usually matters more at home.
Will the presence boost switch on the SM7B fix a dull voice?
It will lift the upper midrange where consonants live, which does read as more clarity. It will not add top end that the capsule does not capture. If your complaint is a lack of air rather than a lack of intelligibility, a condenser in a treated room is the real answer.
Do I still need a pop filter with a dynamic?
Usually yes, unless the microphone has one built in — the PodMic and the RE20 both do. Everything else on this page benefits from one at close range. Best pop filters covers the mesh-versus-metal question and the weight it adds to your arm.
Is the SM7dB just an SM7B with a box taped on?
Functionally that is a fair description, and it is bypassable so it behaves as a plain SM7B when you want it to. The trade-off is that a separate booster can be moved to another low-output microphone later, and the built-in one cannot. SM7B vs SM7dB works through when each is the cheaper choice.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.