Skip to content
Mic & Mix

Cloudlifter CL-1 vs FetHead

27 dB in a cable barrel against 25 dB in a box. The gain gap is small; the impedance and the form factor are not.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

Cloudlifter CL-1 vs FetHead: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Triton Audio FetHeadThe most gain in the smallest package
Gain27 dB8.8
2
Cloud Microphones Cloudlifter CL-1The reference booster, and the safest one
Gain+25 dB8.6

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

Buy the FetHead for most setups: 27 dB against 25 dB, a 22 kohm input impedance that suits a dynamic capsule, and no desk space or second cable. Buy the Cloudlifter CL-1 if you own or might own a ribbon microphone and want the more robust housing, or if your boom arm cannot take weight hanging off the microphone.

Published specifications. Both require phantom power and neither passes it through to the microphone.
Cloudlifter CL-1Triton Audio FetHead
GainUp to +25 dB27 dB at a 3 kohm load
CircuitClass-A discrete JFETClass A JFET
Input impedance3 kohms fixed load22 kohms
Frequency responseNot published as a figure10 Hz to 100 kHz, +/-1 dB
Phantom powerRequires +48 V, does not pass itRequires 24-48 V, does not pass it
Form factorDesktop box, two XLR cablesInline barrel, one cable
Ribbon-safeYesYes

The impedance difference is the real one

The gain figures are 2 dB apart, which is a small edge to the FetHead and occasionally a decisive one on a 55 dB interface. What differs more substantially is the load each device presents to the microphone: the Cloudlifter presents a fixed 3 kohms, the FetHead presents 22 kohms.

A dynamic capsule behaves differently into a light load than a heavy one — its damping changes, and with it the low-frequency behavior. Cloud Microphones describe their fixed 3 kohm load as optimized for a wide variety of microphones, which is a defensible design goal: a consistent, known load. Triton's 22 kohms lets the capsule run closer to unloaded.

We have not measured either, and we are not going to tell you one sounds better than the other on your microphone. What is worth knowing is that when people report hearing a difference between these two products, this documented electrical difference is the most likely reason — it is not imagination.

Choose the FetHead if

  • You want the extra 2 dB. On a 55 dB interface with an SM7B, 2 dB is a meaningful fraction of the shortfall.
  • Desk space is scarce, or you do not want a second XLR cable in the run.
  • You want the published response figure — 10 Hz to 100 kHz at +/-1 dB is documented, where the Cloudlifter's is not.
  • Your microphone sits on a short, well-supported mount where a little extra weight at the connector is harmless.

Choose the Cloudlifter CL-1 if

  • Your microphone is on a long or lightly sprung boom arm. An inline barrel adds leverage right at the worst point.
  • You own or plan to own a ribbon microphone and want the more substantial, more clearly documented ribbon-safe device.
  • You want a box that cannot be knocked out of its socket mid-recording.
  • You prefer a known, fixed load and the predictability that brings across different microphones.

The weight problem, concretely

An inline booster hangs off the XLR connector at the back of the microphone, which is the end of a lever. On a Rode PSA1+ rated for 94 g to 1.2 kg, an SM7B plus a FetHead plus a metal pop filter is getting close to the top of the range. It will hold, but positioning becomes fussier and drift over a session is more likely.

The Cloudlifter sits on the desk and the microphone carries nothing extra. If your arm already sags, this is not a detail — it is the deciding factor.

What else you need to buy

  • Cloudlifter: a second XLR cable, because it sits between microphone and interface. Best XLR cables.
  • FetHead: nothing.
  • Both: an interface with phantom power, which every interface on this site has.

Both boosters in detail

#1

Triton Audio FetHead

Top pick

Triton Audio · The most gain in the smallest package

The pick for most people boosting an SM7B or PodMic: more gain than the alternative, in nothing. Choose the Cloudlifter instead if the mic is on a long unsupported arm or if you own a ribbon.

Why it is here

  • 27 dB is 2 dB more than a Cloudlifter, from something the size of a cable barrel
  • 22 kohm input impedance lets a dynamic capsule behave the way its designer intended
  • No desk space, no second cable

What it costs you

  • Hangs off the back of the mic, adding weight and leverage to your boom arm
  • Nothing to see — no LED, so a phantom-power mistake is silent
  • Not for condensers, which need the phantom power it blocks
Published specifications for the Triton Audio FetHead, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Gain27 dB at a 3 kohm loadspec
PowerRequires 24 to 48 V phantom; does not pass phantom to the micspec
Input impedance22 kohmsspec
Frequency response10 Hz to 100 kHz, +/-1 dBspec
#2

Cloud Microphones Cloudlifter CL-1

Cloud Microphones · The reference booster, and the safest one

The right booster if you own or might own a ribbon mic, or if you want the version that cannot be knocked out of its socket. If neither applies, a FetHead does the same job smaller and cheaper.

Why it is here

  • +25 dB turns a 55 dB interface into an 80 dB one for a passive mic
  • Blocks phantom power downstream, so a ribbon mic is safe behind it
  • A box, not a dongle — it stays put and takes strain off the XLR connector

What it costs you

  • Needs two XLR cables and a spot on the desk
  • Costs as much as some interfaces
  • Does nothing for a condenser, which needs the phantom it blocks
Published specifications for the Cloud Microphones Cloudlifter CL-1, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
GainUp to +25 dBspec
CircuitClass-A discrete JFETspec
PowerRequires +48 V phantom; does not pass phantom to the micspec
LoadFixed 3 kohm impedancespec

If neither: the third option

The sE Electronics DM1 Dynamite gives +28 dB — the most of any inline option here — in the same barrel form factor. And if you have not bought the microphone yet, the SM7dB has +28 dB built in and needs no booster at all.

Questions people actually ask

Cloudlifter or FetHead for an SM7B?
FetHead for most people, on the 2 dB gain advantage and the lack of desk clutter. Cloudlifter if your boom arm is long or lightly sprung, or if a ribbon microphone is in your future.
Do these work with condenser microphones?
No. Both block phantom power downstream, and a condenser needs it to work. These are for passive microphones only — dynamics and ribbons.
Does a booster add noise?
A small amount of its own, but it lets your interface run at a far lower gain setting where the interface contributes much less. The net effect on a low-output dynamic is a clearly quieter recording.
Can I use one with a mixer?
Yes, provided the mixer channel supplies phantom power to that input. Without phantom power neither device will run at all.
Is the impedance difference audible?
Some people report it and the electrical difference is real and documented. We have not measured it and will not claim a verdict we cannot support. If you have a preference from experience, trust it — you are not imagining the mechanism.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.