Skip to content
Mic & Mix

Electro-Voice RE20 vs Shure SM7B

One engineers the proximity effect out. The other gives you a switch and expects you to manage it. That is the whole comparison.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

Electro-Voice RE20 vs Shure SM7B: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Electro-Voice RE20Movers, leaners and anyone who cannot hold mic distance
Proximity controlContinuously Variable-D8.1
2
Shure SM7BThe default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa8.4

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

Buy the RE20 if you move, lean or gesture while you talk, or if guests use the microphone — its Variable-D design keeps your tone nearly constant as your distance changes. Buy the SM7B if you sit at a fixed distance, because proximity effect then becomes a tool and the voicing switches give you more control.

Published specifications for both microphones.
Electro-Voice RE20Shure SM7B
TypeDynamic, cardioid, Variable-DDynamic, cardioid
Frequency response45 Hz to 18 kHzFlat, wide-range
Sensitivity1.5 mV/Pa (approx. -56 dBV)-59.0 dBV/Pa (1.12 mV)
Impedance150 ohms balanced150 ohms
FilterBass tilt-down, ~2.25 dB/octave below 400 HzBass rolloff switch
Presence boostNoYes, switchable
Blast filterIntegral, over each acoustic openingSupplied windscreen

What Variable-D actually does

Every directional microphone exhibits proximity effect: get closer and the low frequencies rise. On a cardioid that is dramatic — the difference between four inches and twelve inches is a completely different voice. Variable-D uses multiple rear-entry ports tuned to different frequencies so that the low-frequency rise is largely canceled, which Electro-Voice describes as being virtually free of bass-boosting proximity effect at close range.

The consequence is practical, not tonal: your voice sounds the same when you lean in to read a note and when you sit back to think. If you have ever fought a take because your level and tone drifted with your posture, that is what you are buying.

Choose the RE20 if

  • You move while you talk. Almost everyone does more than they think, and it shows up as inconsistent low end across a long recording.
  • You share the microphone with guests whose technique you cannot direct.
  • You record standing, or from a floor stand where your distance is less controlled than at a desk.
  • You want the integral blast filter rather than clamping a pop filter onto your arm.

Choose the SM7B if

  • You sit still at a fixed distance, in which case proximity effect is a deliberate tool for adding weight to a light voice.
  • You want the presence boost switch. The RE20 has a bass tilt-down but no presence control, and the SM7B's is genuinely useful on a dull voice.
  • You want the flatter, more neutral starting point that most people find more immediately flattering.
  • Price matters. The RE20 costs more while being the less immediately impressive microphone on most voices.

Gain requirements: close, with a small edge to the RE20

The RE20's 1.5 mV/Pa works out at roughly -56 dBV, against the SM7B's -59.0 dBV/Pa. That is about 3 dB in the RE20's favor, which is real but does not change the category: both are low-output broadcast dynamics that want a preamp with headroom. If your interface is under 58 dB, plan for a booster with either.

Total cost of ownership

  • RE20: more expensive microphone, no pop filter needed, same booster question, and a heavy body that wants a solid mount.
  • SM7B: cheaper microphone, windscreen supplied, same booster question, and the voicing switches that may save you a plug-in.

Both microphones in detail

#1

Electro-Voice RE20

Top pick

Electro-Voice · Movers, leaners and anyone who cannot hold mic distance

Worth the premium if you move while you talk, gesture, or share a mic with someone whose technique you cannot control. If you sit still at a fixed distance, the SM7B's proximity effect is a feature you will use, not a problem you need engineered away.

Why it is here

  • Variable-D means the tone barely changes as you drift closer to or further from the grille
  • Integral blast filter handles close talking without a separate pop screen
  • The bass tilt-down switch is a genuinely useful second voicing, not a gimmick

What it costs you

  • Costs more than an SM7B while sounding less immediately flattering on most voices
  • Same low-output problem as every broadcast dynamic
  • Large and beige, which some people mind
Published specifications for the Electro-Voice RE20, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioid, Variable-Dspec
Frequency response45 Hz to 18 kHzspec
Sensitivity1.5 mV/Paspec
Impedance150 ohms balancedspec
FilterBass tilt-down switch, approx. 2.25 dB/octave below 400 Hzspec
#2

Shure SM7B

Shure · The default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it

Buy it if your interface supplies 60 dB or more of clean gain, or if you are budgeting for a booster alongside it. Buy something else if your only interface is a Scarlett Solo and you are not prepared to add hardware.

Why it is here

  • Rejects room and computer-fan noise better than any condenser at any price
  • Two voicing switches let one mic cover a thin voice and a boomy one
  • Internal shockmount and a yoke that actually holds position on a boom arm

What it costs you

  • At -59.0 dBV/Pa it is one of the quietest mics sold, so it demands a loud preamp
  • Total cost is the mic plus, very often, a booster
  • Heavy enough that a cheap desk arm will droop under it
Published specifications for the Shure SM7B, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa (1.12 mV)spec
Output impedance150 ohmsspec
Voicing controlsBass rolloff and presence boost switchesspec

If neither: the third option

If the appeal of the RE20 was the built-in filter and the forgiving handling at a lower price, the Rode PodMic has an internal pop filter and an internal shockmount for far less — it just does not have Variable-D. The whole field is in best dynamic microphones for vocals.

Questions people actually ask

Is the RE20 worth more than the SM7B?
If you cannot hold a steady distance, yes — consistency across an hour of recording is worth more than a nicer tone on a perfect take. If you sit still, you are paying more for a feature you will not use.
Does the RE20 sound worse than the SM7B?
It sounds different: less obviously flattered, because the low-frequency lift that makes close-up cardioid recordings sound rich is exactly what Variable-D removes. Many people describe it as more natural and less produced.
Do I still need a pop filter with the RE20?
Usually not. The integral blast and wind filter over each acoustic opening is designed for close talking, which is one of the practical arguments for it.
Which needs less gain?
The RE20, by roughly 3 dB. Both are low-output dynamics though, so on an interface below 58 dB you should budget for a booster either way.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.