Skip to content
Mic & Mix

Electro-Voice RE20 vs Rode PodMic

One is engineered so your tone does not change when you move. The other costs a fraction as much and asks you to sit still.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

Electro-Voice RE20 vs Rode PodMic: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Electro-Voice RE20Movers, leaners and anyone who cannot hold mic distance
Proximity controlContinuously Variable-D8.1
2
Rode PodMicThe best value in a broadcast dynamic
Sensitivity-57 dBV/Pa8.4
3
Shure SM7BThe default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa8.4

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

Buy the RE20 if you or your guests move while you talk — its Continuously Variable-D design means the tone barely changes as you drift closer to or further from the grille, which no fixed-cardioid microphone can match. Buy the Rode PodMic if you sit at a fixed distance: at -57 dBV/Pa it is hotter, it has an internal pop filter and shockmount, and it costs a fraction as much.

This is a comparison between a solution and a price. The RE20 solves one specific, real problem that nothing else in this price range solves. The PodMic does not solve it, and is the best value in a broadcast dynamic anyway. Which of those two sentences describes your situation is the whole decision.

Published figures from both manufacturers. The two sensitivity figures are quoted on different scales, so both are given exactly as published rather than converted.
Electro-Voice RE20Rode PodMic
TypeDynamic, cardioid, Variable-DDynamic, cardioid
Proximity controlContinuously Variable-DNone, standard proximity effect
Frequency response45 Hz - 18 kHz20 Hz - 20 kHz
Sensitivity1.5 mV/Pa-57 dB re 1 V/Pa (1.60 mV)
Impedance150 ohms balanced320 ohms
FilterBass tilt-down, approx. 2.25 dB per octave below 400 HzNone
Built inIntegral blast filterPop filter and shockmount

What Variable-D actually does

Every ordinary cardioid microphone has a proximity effect: get closer and the low frequencies rise, back off and they fall away. On a controlled voice-over that is a tone control you can use deliberately. On a two-hour conversation where you lean in to make a point and sit back to laugh, it is a tone that changes under you — and no compressor fixes it, because the problem is spectral, not level.

Variable-D addresses it mechanically: the capsule has multiple rear entry ports at different distances, so the low-frequency rise is largely canceled as you move. The practical result is that an RE20 sounds like an RE20 at four inches and at twelve. That is why it has been in broadcast studios for decades, and it is a genuine engineering answer rather than a marketing one.

The cost is that the RE20 is not a flattering microphone. It is deliberately even. If you sit still and want the low-end lift a cardioid gives you up close, the SM7B's proximity effect is a feature you will use rather than a problem you need engineered away.

Where the PodMic wins

  • Output. -57 dBV/Pa is 2 dB hotter than an SM7B and enough to matter on a 58 dB interface. The RE20 publishes 1.5 mV/Pa, which puts it in the same low-output broadcast-dynamic territory — plan for a hot preamp either way, and read how much clean gain do you need first.
  • Bandwidth. 20 Hz to 20 kHz published against the RE20's 45 Hz to 18 kHz. For speech, irrelevant. For singing or an instrument, the PodMic is the more flexible microphone.
  • What is in the box. Internal pop filter and internal shockmount, so nothing else clamps to your arm.
  • Price. It is the best value in a broadcast dynamic on this site, and the RE20 costs more than an SM7B.

Where the RE20 wins

  • Anyone whose technique you cannot control. A guest who has never used a microphone will move. Variable-D is the only thing on this page that makes that not matter.
  • Shared microphones. A mic passed between two people at different heights is the exact case Variable-D was designed for.
  • A second voicing you will use. The bass tilt-down switch rolls off at roughly 2.25 dB per octave below 400 Hz — a gentler, broader shape than a hard high-pass, and genuinely useful on a chesty voice.
  • Close work without a separate screen. The integral blast filter handles plosives at conversational distance.

Both microphones, plus the default

#1

Electro-Voice RE20

Top pick

Electro-Voice · Movers, leaners and anyone who cannot hold mic distance

Worth the premium if you move while you talk, gesture, or share a mic with someone whose technique you cannot control. If you sit still at a fixed distance, the SM7B's proximity effect is a feature you will use, not a problem you need engineered away.

Why it is here

  • Variable-D means the tone barely changes as you drift closer to or further from the grille
  • Integral blast filter handles close talking without a separate pop screen
  • The bass tilt-down switch is a genuinely useful second voicing, not a gimmick

What it costs you

  • Costs more than an SM7B while sounding less immediately flattering on most voices
  • Same low-output problem as every broadcast dynamic
  • Large and beige, which some people mind
Published specifications for the Electro-Voice RE20, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioid, Variable-Dspec
Frequency response45 Hz to 18 kHzspec
Sensitivity1.5 mV/Paspec
Impedance150 ohms balancedspec
FilterBass tilt-down switch, approx. 2.25 dB/octave below 400 Hzspec
#2

Rode PodMic

Rode · The best value in a broadcast dynamic

The pick for most people upgrading from a USB mic: it gets you 90 percent of the broadcast-dynamic sound without the booster arithmetic. Choose the SM7B instead if your voice is already bass-heavy and you want the bass-rolloff switch.

Why it is here

  • At -57 dBV/Pa it needs about 2 dB less gain than an SM7B, which is enough to matter on a 58 dB interface
  • Internal pop filter means one less thing clamped to your arm
  • All-metal body at a fraction of the SM7B's price

What it costs you

  • Voiced with more low-mid weight than the SM7B, so a boomy voice can get boomier
  • No voicing switches, so you fix tone in the DAW rather than on the mic
  • Still low enough output that a 55 dB interface will be working hard
Published specifications for the Rode PodMic, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-57 dB re 1 V/Pa (1.60 mV at 94 dB SPL)spec
Frequency range20 Hz to 20 kHzspec
Output impedance320 ohmsspec
Built inInternal pop filter and internal shockmountspec
#3

Shure SM7B

Shure · The default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it

Buy it if your interface supplies 60 dB or more of clean gain, or if you are budgeting for a booster alongside it. Buy something else if your only interface is a Scarlett Solo and you are not prepared to add hardware.

Why it is here

  • Rejects room and computer-fan noise better than any condenser at any price
  • Two voicing switches let one mic cover a thin voice and a boomy one
  • Internal shockmount and a yoke that actually holds position on a boom arm

What it costs you

  • At -59.0 dBV/Pa it is one of the quietest mics sold, so it demands a loud preamp
  • Total cost is the mic plus, very often, a booster
  • Heavy enough that a cheap desk arm will droop under it
Published specifications for the Shure SM7B, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa (1.12 mV)spec
Output impedance150 ohmsspec
Voicing controlsBass rolloff and presence boost switchesspec

Neither, if the room is the real problem

Both of these are dynamics, which means both already reject far more room than any condenser would. If your takes still sound hollow or boxy, the microphone is not the variable — the wall behind you is. A reflection filter or two panels at the first reflection points will change your recordings more than the difference between these two microphones. Soundproofing vs acoustic treatment explains which problem you actually have, and treating a bedroom studio is the cheapest fix.

What else you need

  • A preamp with headroom. Both are low-output dynamics. Best audio interfaces for the Shure SM7B lists the boxes with published gain figures high enough for any of them.
  • A stand that holds the weight. The RE20 is a large microphone and the PodMic is all metal. Best boom arms for microphones.
  • Nothing else. Neither needs phantom power, and neither needs a pop filter added.
A broadcast-style dynamic microphone on a desk boom arm in a home studio
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

Is the Electro-Voice RE20 better than the Rode PodMic?
Better at one specific thing: holding its tone while you move, because of its Continuously Variable-D design. On output, bandwidth, what is in the box and price, the PodMic wins. If you sit still, buy the PodMic.
What does Variable-D mean on the RE20?
Multiple rear entry ports at different distances from the capsule, which largely cancels the proximity effect. In practice the microphone sounds the same at four inches and at twelve, which is why broadcasters use it with guests whose technique they cannot control.
Does the RE20 need a Cloudlifter?
It is a low-output dynamic like every other broadcast microphone here, published at 1.5 mV/Pa, so it wants a preamp with real headroom. The better answer than a booster is an interface with a published gain figure of 60 dB or more — see cloudlifter vs fethead for when the inline route is genuinely right.
Is the PodMic good enough for a professional podcast?
Yes. The 20 Hz to 20 kHz published response, internal shockmount and internal pop filter are a complete broadcast feature set, and the limitation is the absence of tone switches rather than anything in the capsule.
Which is better for two people sharing one microphone?
The RE20, without qualification. Two people at different heights and distances is exactly the problem Variable-D solves. For two people with a microphone each, see two-person podcast setup.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.