Skip to content
Mic & Mix

Audient iD4 MKII vs MOTU M2

Identical published noise figures, opposite answers on inputs and on whether the gain number exists at all.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

Audient iD4 MKII vs MOTU M2: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Audient iD4 MKIIThe best-sounding single preamp here
Mic gain range0 to 58 dB8.2
2
MOTU M2The best converters and metering at the price
Mic input EIN-129 dB8.8

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

Buy the MOTU M2 if you might ever record two sources at once, or if you want front-panel LCD metering — it is the more flexible box. Buy the Audient iD4 MKII if you record one microphone and want the cleanest single channel at the price: 0 to 58 dB of published gain, -129 dB(A) EIN and 0.0017% THD+N, with two headphone outputs on a one-input interface.

Published figures from Audient and MOTU. “Not published” means the manufacturer states no figure for that specification — it is not an estimate of ours.
Audient iD4 MKIIMOTU M2
Mic inputs12
Published max mic gain0 to 58 dBNot published
Mic input EIN-129 dB(A)-129 dB
THD+N0.0017% at 0 dBuNot published
Mic input dynamic rangeNot published115 dB
Main output dynamic rangeNot published120 dB
Preamp or converter claimAudient Class A console mic preampESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC
Sample ratesNot published44.1 to 192 kHz

The specification that is missing is the one that matters

Both interfaces publish -129 dB EIN, which is genuinely good and which tells you how little hiss the preamp adds. Neither is the weak link on noise. The real difference in the table is that Audient publishes a maximum gain figure and MOTU does not.

That matters because gain is the specification that decides which microphones are viable. With the iD4 you can do the arithmetic before you buy: 58 dB is comfortable for any condenser and for a hot dynamic, and it is not enough for an SM7B without a booster. With the M2 you cannot do that arithmetic at all, because the number does not exist publicly — you are relying on reports rather than a spec sheet.

If your microphone is already chosen and it is a low-output broadcast dynamic, neither of these is the obvious buy. A Scarlett 2i2 at `69 dB` removes the question entirely.

Choose the iD4 MKII if

  • You record one microphone, and you expect that to stay true.
  • You want a published gain figure you can plan a microphone purchase against.
  • Someone else sometimes listens in — two headphone outputs on a single-input box is unusual and genuinely useful.
  • Your microphone is a condenser or a hot dynamic, so 58 dB is plenty. Best condenser microphones for a home studio is that field.

Choose the M2 if

  • A second input is plausible — a guest, a guitar, a hardware synth.
  • You want to see your levels on the box rather than alt-tabbing to a meter. The full-color LCD is the single most useful daily feature on either interface.
  • You care about the output side as well as the input: 120 dB on the main outputs is the better number here for driving monitors.
  • You want independent phantom power and monitor switching per channel.

What neither of them does

Neither has any onboard DSP, voicing or compression, and that is the right decision at this tier — processing printed into a recording is a choice you cannot revisit in the edit. Neither has MIDI, so a 5-pin synth needs a separate box; best audio interfaces with MIDI covers that case.

And neither solves a room. If your recordings sound boxy rather than hissy, the purchase is acoustic treatment, not a converter.

Both interfaces in detail

#1

Audient iD4 MKII

Top pick

Audient · The best-sounding single preamp here

The right box if your mic is a condenser or a hot dynamic and you want the cleanest single channel at this price. If you are buying an SM7B, 58 dB puts you straight back into booster territory.

Why it is here

  • -129 dB(A) EIN and 0.0017% THD+N are numbers you would expect a tier up
  • The Class A preamp is the same circuit family as Audient's consoles
  • Two headphone outputs on a one-input box, which is unusual and useful

What it costs you

  • 58 dB is not enough for an SM7B without a booster
  • One mic input only
  • No onboard DSP or voicing
Published specifications for the Audient iD4 MKII, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain range0 to 58 dBspec
EIN-129 dB(A)spec
THD+N0.0017% at 0 dBuspec
PreampAudient Class A console mic preampspec
#2

MOTU M2

MOTU · The best converters and metering at the price

The pick if you care most about conversion quality and want to see your levels without alt-tabbing. If your mic is an SM7B and you want a published gain number you can check against the mic's sensitivity, the 2i2 is the safer buy.

Why it is here

  • -129 dB EIN is genuinely quiet, and it shows on low-output dynamics
  • Full-color LCD metering on the box is more useful day to day than any software mixer
  • Independent phantom power and monitor switching per input

What it costs you

  • MOTU does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure the way Focusrite does, so gain headroom is harder to plan around
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
  • Loopback needs the software, not a front-panel switch
Published specifications for the MOTU M2, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic input EIN-129 dBspec
Mic input dynamic range115 dBspec
Main output dynamic range120 dBspec
ConvertersESS Sabre32 Ultra DACspec
Sample rates44.1 to 192 kHzspec

If neither: the third option

For a broadcast dynamic, the Scarlett 2i2's published 69 dB is the pragmatic answer and costs less than either. For two people monitoring separately, the SSL 2+ MKII is the one with two headphone outputs and 64 dB. The full field is in best audio interfaces for a home studio.

Questions people actually ask

Is the Audient iD4 better than the MOTU M2?
On a single channel the iD4 MKII has the better published numbers — 0.0017% THD+N and a stated 58 dB gain range. The M2 is the more useful interface, because it has two inputs, LCD metering and a published 120 dB output dynamic range.
How much gain does the MOTU M2 have?
MOTU does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure for the M2, which is the main planning weakness of the interface. The M4 in the same family publishes 60 dB, but we do not treat that as a figure for the M2.
Will either of these drive an SM7B?
The iD4 MKII's 58 dB is at the edge and most people add a booster. For the M2 there is no published figure to check against, so it is a gamble with that microphone. A 69 dB interface removes the question.
Do I need two mic inputs?
Only if a second microphone is realistic. If it is not, the iD4 spends the whole budget on one better channel — which is a reasonable trade, and the reason that interface exists.
Which has better converters?
MOTU publishes 115 dB on the mic input and 120 dB on the main outputs, with ESS conversion. Audient publishes EIN and THD+N but not dynamic range. On the figures that exist, the M2 is the better-documented converter and the iD4 the better-documented preamp.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.