Skip to content
Mic & Mix

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 vs MOTU M2

One publishes the best gain figure at the price. The other publishes the best noise figure. Your microphone decides which you need.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 vs MOTU M2: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)The most gain per dollar in a two-input box
Max mic gain69 dB8.7
2
MOTU M2The best converters and metering at the price
Mic input EIN-129 dB8.8

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

Buy the Scarlett 2i2 if your microphone is a low-output dynamic — 69 dB of published gain removes the booster question entirely, and Focusrite tells you the figure. Buy the MOTU M2 if your microphone is a condenser or a hot dynamic and you want the better converters, the -129 dB EIN and the front-panel metering.

Published specifications. Note the asymmetry: each manufacturer publishes the figure the other does not.
Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)MOTU M2
Max mic gain69 dBNot published
Mic input EINNot published-129 dB
Mic input dynamic rangeNot published separately115 dB
Output dynamic range120 dB120 dB
ConvertersSame as Focusrite's RedNet lineESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC
Sample ratesUp to 192 kHz44.1 to 192 kHz
MeteringGain halo LEDsFull-color LCD, both channels
VoicingAir modeNone
Mic inputs2, independent 48 V2, independent 48 V

The specification gap that decides it

These two boxes are close enough in price and features that the honest deciding factor is which published number you need. Focusrite publishes 69 dB maximum mic gain. MOTU publishes -129 dB EIN and 115 dB mic-input dynamic range but no maximum gain figure at all.

If your microphone is an SM7B at -59.0 dBV/Pa, that missing figure matters. You cannot plan a gain budget against an unpublished number, and the SM7B is precisely the microphone where the budget is tight. MOTU's preamps are widely reported to be capable, but "widely reported" is not a specification and we will not print a figure we cannot cite.

If your microphone is a condenser at -33 dB, the gain question evaporates and the MOTU's genuinely excellent noise and conversion specifications become the interesting part.

Choose the Scarlett 2i2 if

  • Your microphone is a low-output dynamic, or might be. 69 dB is the most gain at this price and it is documented.
  • You want Air mode as a fixed voicing option on the way in.
  • You want the cheaper of the two, which it generally is.
  • You want the safest single purchase for an unknown future microphone.

Choose the MOTU M2 if

  • Your microphones are condensers or hot dynamics where gain is not the constraint.
  • You want to see your levels on the box rather than alt-tabbing to a meter. The LCD is more useful day to day than it sounds.
  • You care about the conversion path — -129 dB EIN and the ESS Sabre32 DAC are a real step up on paper.
  • You want per-channel monitor switching, which the M2 has on the front panel.

Monitoring and routing

The M2 wins here for anyone tracking regularly. Independent phantom power and a monitor switch per input, plus real metering, means you set up by looking at the box rather than at software. The 2i2's gain halos tell you when you are clipping but not much else.

Both have one headphone output, which is the limitation that matters if a second person is involved — see best 2-channel audio interfaces and the SSL 2+ MKII, which has two.

What else you need to buy

  • Scarlett 2i2: nothing. It drives every microphone on this site.
  • MOTU M2: possibly a booster if you pair it with a very low-output dynamic, because you cannot verify the headroom in advance.

Both interfaces in detail

#1

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)

Top pick

Focusrite · The most gain per dollar in a two-input box

The default answer for someone buying an SM7B or PodMic: it supplies enough clean gain that you never need a booster, which makes it the cheaper total purchase even when it is not the cheaper box. Look elsewhere only if you need MIDI or four outputs.

Why it is here

  • 69 dB is the most gain of any interface at this price, and enough for an SM7B with headroom to spare
  • 120 dB dynamic range means the converters are not the weak link
  • Two inputs, so a second person does not mean a second purchase

What it costs you

  • Air mode is a fixed voicing, not an EQ you can dial
  • Plastic-and-metal build feels less solid than the SSL or Audient competition
  • No MIDI, which matters if you also play keys
Published specifications for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen), with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain69 dBspec
Dynamic range120 dBspec
Inputs2 XLR/TRS combo with independent 48 Vspec
VoicingAir modespec
#2

MOTU M2

MOTU · The best converters and metering at the price

The pick if you care most about conversion quality and want to see your levels without alt-tabbing. If your mic is an SM7B and you want a published gain number you can check against the mic's sensitivity, the 2i2 is the safer buy.

Why it is here

  • -129 dB EIN is genuinely quiet, and it shows on low-output dynamics
  • Full-color LCD metering on the box is more useful day to day than any software mixer
  • Independent phantom power and monitor switching per input

What it costs you

  • MOTU does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure the way Focusrite does, so gain headroom is harder to plan around
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
  • Loopback needs the software, not a front-panel switch
Published specifications for the MOTU M2, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic input EIN-129 dBspec
Mic input dynamic range115 dBspec
Main output dynamic range120 dBspec
ConvertersESS Sabre32 Ultra DACspec
Sample rates44.1 to 192 kHzspec

If neither: the third option

If two headphone outputs matter, the SSL 2+ MKII is the box for you at 64 dB. If you want the cleanest single channel and only need one, the Audient iD4 MKII publishes -129 dB(A) EIN alongside its 58 dB gain. The full field is in best audio interfaces for a home studio.

Questions people actually ask

Does the MOTU M2 have enough gain for an SM7B?
MOTU does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure, so we cannot tell you from the specification — and we are not going to guess. Its -129 dB EIN suggests a quiet circuit, but quiet is not the same as loud enough. If an SM7B is the plan and certainty matters, the Scarlett 2i2's documented 69 dB is the safer purchase.
Are MOTU's converters actually better?
On paper the ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC and the published -129 dB EIN are a step up. Whether you can hear it in an untreated room is another question, and usually the answer is that the room is louder than the difference.
Is Air mode worth anything?
It is a fixed voicing that lifts the presence region. Some voices suit it, some do not, and unlike a plug-in you cannot adjust it or remove it afterwards. Treat it as a bonus, not a reason to buy.
Which is better for recording an instrument?
Both have Hi-Z instrument inputs and both are fine. The M2's metering makes setting a level for an unfamiliar source easier, which is a small but genuine practical edge.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.