Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best Audio Interfaces for Mac

On macOS there is no driver to install, so the ranking comes down to conversion, bus power and how well the box behaves on a laptop.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best Audio Interfaces for Mac: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
MOTU M2The best converters and metering at the price
Mic input EIN-129 dB8.8
2
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)The most gain per dollar in a two-input box
Max mic gain69 dB8.7
3
Audient iD4 MKIIThe best-sounding single preamp here
Mic gain range0 to 58 dB8.2
4
Universal Audio Volt 2A hardware color option on the way in
Mic gain55 dB7.8
5
MOTU M4Four channels, MIDI and the best converters here
Max mic gain60 dB9.1

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The MOTU M2 is the best interface for a Mac: -129 dB EIN and an ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC give it the best published conversion figures at this price, it is fully class-compliant so there is nothing to install, and its front-panel color metering means you set levels by looking at the box rather than at a window.

macOS removes the variable that dominates the Windows version of this page: Core Audio speaks to class-compliant devices natively, so there is no ASIO driver to install, nothing to break on an OS update, and no driver-quality track record to weigh. Every interface here works the moment you plug it in.

What is left to judge is conversion quality, whether it runs from bus power on a laptop, and whether the connector matches your machine.

Published figures and macOS-relevant considerations. All figures manufacturer published; sources on each product card.
InterfaceMax mic gainEINClass compliantBus powered
MOTU M2Not published-129 dBYesYes, USB-C
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)69 dBNot publishedYesYes, USB-C
Audient iD4 MKII58 dB-129 dB(A)YesYes, USB-C
Universal Audio Volt 255 dB-127 dBuYesYes
MOTU M460 dB-129 dBuYesYes, USB-C

The five interfaces, ranked for macOS

#1

MOTU M2

Top pick

MOTU · The best converters and metering at the price

The pick if you care most about conversion quality and want to see your levels without alt-tabbing. If your mic is an SM7B and you want a published gain number you can check against the mic's sensitivity, the 2i2 is the safer buy.

Why it is here

  • -129 dB EIN is genuinely quiet, and it shows on low-output dynamics
  • Full-color LCD metering on the box is more useful day to day than any software mixer
  • Independent phantom power and monitor switching per input

What it costs you

  • MOTU does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure the way Focusrite does, so gain headroom is harder to plan around
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
  • Loopback needs the software, not a front-panel switch
Published specifications for the MOTU M2, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic input EIN-129 dBspec
Mic input dynamic range115 dBspec
Main output dynamic range120 dBspec
ConvertersESS Sabre32 Ultra DACspec
Sample rates44.1 to 192 kHzspec
#2

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)

Focusrite · The most gain per dollar in a two-input box

The default answer for someone buying an SM7B or PodMic: it supplies enough clean gain that you never need a booster, which makes it the cheaper total purchase even when it is not the cheaper box. Look elsewhere only if you need MIDI or four outputs.

Why it is here

  • 69 dB is the most gain of any interface at this price, and enough for an SM7B with headroom to spare
  • 120 dB dynamic range means the converters are not the weak link
  • Two inputs, so a second person does not mean a second purchase

What it costs you

  • Air mode is a fixed voicing, not an EQ you can dial
  • Plastic-and-metal build feels less solid than the SSL or Audient competition
  • No MIDI, which matters if you also play keys
Published specifications for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen), with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain69 dBspec
Dynamic range120 dBspec
Inputs2 XLR/TRS combo with independent 48 Vspec
VoicingAir modespec
#3

Audient iD4 MKII

Audient · The best-sounding single preamp here

The right box if your mic is a condenser or a hot dynamic and you want the cleanest single channel at this price. If you are buying an SM7B, 58 dB puts you straight back into booster territory.

Why it is here

  • -129 dB(A) EIN and 0.0017% THD+N are numbers you would expect a tier up
  • The Class A preamp is the same circuit family as Audient's consoles
  • Two headphone outputs on a one-input box, which is unusual and useful

What it costs you

  • 58 dB is not enough for an SM7B without a booster
  • One mic input only
  • No onboard DSP or voicing
Published specifications for the Audient iD4 MKII, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain range0 to 58 dBspec
EIN-129 dB(A)spec
THD+N0.0017% at 0 dBuspec
PreampAudient Class A console mic preampspec
#4

Universal Audio Volt 2

Universal Audio · A hardware color option on the way in

Buy it if you want character on the way in and your mic is a condenser or a hot dynamic. With a low-output broadcast dynamic, 55 dB means a booster, and that changes the price comparison entirely.

Why it is here

  • Vintage mode is a real analog-style color, not a plug-in you could add later
  • Two combo inputs and a clean, legible front panel
  • The UA software bundle is worth actual money

What it costs you

  • 55 dB is the lowest gain ceiling in this group and the least SM7B-friendly
  • 112 dB dynamic range trails the Focusrite and MOTU converters
  • Vintage mode is a commitment printed into the recording
Published specifications for the Universal Audio Volt 2, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain55 dB availablespec
Dynamic range112 dB (A-weighted)spec
EIN-127 dBu (150 ohms, A-weighted)spec
Input impedance3 kohmsspec
VoicingVintage Mic Preamp Mode (UA 610 emulation)spec
#5

MOTU M4

MOTU · Four channels, MIDI and the best converters here

The pick if you want MOTU's conversion plus MIDI and a couple of extra line inputs. If you only ever record one or two microphones and do not need MIDI, the M2 does the same job for less.

Why it is here

  • 60 dB of published gain and `-129 dBu` EIN is a genuinely quiet channel, and unlike the M2 the figure is published
  • MIDI in and out on a box this size saves a separate interface if you play keys
  • Full-color LCD metering for all four channels, which is more useful daily than any software mixer

What it costs you

  • 60 dB is enough for an SM7B but without much headroom to spare
  • Two of the four inputs are line-only, so it is not a four-microphone box
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
Published specifications for the MOTU M4, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain60 dBspec
Mic input EIN-129 dBuspec
Dynamic range120 dB (ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC)spec
MIDI1 in, 1 out (5-pin DIN)spec
I/O2 XLR/TRS combo mic/line/Hi-Z plus 2 balanced line in, 4 outspec

USB-C, Thunderbolt and adapters

All five of these are USB devices, and on a modern Mac that is the right answer — a USB-C interface plugs straight in, and a USB-B one works with a cable or a simple adapter with no performance penalty. Thunderbolt interfaces exist and buy genuinely lower latency at the very bottom of the buffer range, but they cost considerably more and none of the boxes at this price is Thunderbolt.

If you are running amp simulation and chasing the last few milliseconds, that is the one case where Thunderbolt is worth the money. For voice, podcast and ordinary music recording, USB latency is not the limiting factor.

What we did not pick, and why

  • Interfaces that require a driver install on macOS. They exist, and on a platform where class-compliant operation is the norm, needing a kernel extension is a liability rather than a feature.
  • Thunderbolt interfaces. Genuinely lower latency and several times the price. Worth it for heavy amp-sim work, overkill for everything else on this site.
  • Interfaces without USB-C or a supplied cable. A small thing that becomes annoying daily.
  • Anything publishing neither a gain figure nor an EIN figure. The Behringer UMC204HD publishes neither, which is why it is on the budget page rather than this one.

Pair it with

How to choose

  1. If you want the best conversion and metering, take the MOTU M2.
  2. If your microphone is a low-output dynamic, take the Scarlett 2i2 — 69 dB published is the only figure here that clears an SM7B with headroom.
  3. If you want the cleanest single channel, take the iD4 MKII at -129 dB(A) EIN.
  4. If you want analog character on the way in, take the Volt 2.
  5. If you need MIDI and four channels, take the MOTU M4.
A desktop USB audio interface with gain knobs and an XLR input
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best audio interface for Mac?
The MOTU M2 — the best published conversion figures at this price, class-compliant so nothing to install, and front-panel metering. The Scarlett 2i2 is the better choice if your microphone is a low-output dynamic, because it publishes 69 dB of gain.
Do I need drivers for an audio interface on a Mac?
For a class-compliant interface, no — Core Audio handles it natively and it appears the moment you plug it in. Every interface on this page is class-compliant. Some higher-end interfaces do require a driver, which on macOS is a drawback.
Is Thunderbolt better than USB for audio?
It achieves lower latency at very small buffer sizes, which matters if you monitor through amp simulation while playing. For voice, podcasting and ordinary music recording, USB is not the limiting factor and costs far less.
Will a bus-powered interface work on a MacBook?
Yes — all five here run from bus power. The common failure is an unpowered hub shared with drives and a display, which browns out under load. Plug the interface directly into the machine or use a powered hub.
Do I need an audio interface if my Mac already has a headphone jack?
For recording an XLR microphone, yes — nothing else supplies the preamp and phantom power. For playback the interface gives you balanced outputs and a stronger headphone amp. Do I need an audio interface covers the cases where the answer is no.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.