Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best XLR Microphones

Both types, one page, ranked on versatility — because most people buying their first XLR microphone do not yet know what they will record on it.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best XLR Microphones: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Audio-Technica AT2035The value condenser with the switches you actually need
Self-noise12 dB SPL8.1
2
Rode PodMicThe best value in a broadcast dynamic
Sensitivity-57 dBV/Pa8.4
3
Shure SM7BThe default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa8.4
4
Rode NT1 5th GenerationThe quietest capsule most home studios can justify
Self-noise4 dBA8.2
5
Audio-Technica BP40Tighter pickup than a cardioid in a live room
Polar patternHypercardioid8.6
6
Shure SM58The cheapest way to hear what a dynamic does for you
Sensitivity-54.5 dBV/Pa8.5

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The Audio-Technica AT2035 is the most useful single XLR microphone for most people: a 12 dB SPL condenser with an 80 Hz high-pass and a -10 dB pad, hot enough that no interface struggles with it, and genuinely capable on voice and acoustic instruments. If your room is untreated, the Rode PodMic is the better buy instead.

This page is deliberately broader than our other microphone roundups. Best XLR microphones for podcasting assumes you are recording speech. Best dynamic microphones for vocals and best condensers for vocals assume you have already chosen a type. This page assumes you have not — you want one XLR microphone, you are not certain yet what you will point it at, and you want the one least likely to be the wrong purchase.

Two numbers decide the whole category

Sensitivity, published in dBV/Pa, tells you how much gain the microphone demands. Always negative; more negative is quieter and hungrier. Type tells you how much of your room arrives with your voice. Everything else is downstream.

Published sensitivity, type, and the clean gain each microphone wants for spoken word at a normal distance. Sensitivity figures are manufacturer published; the gain column is our reading of what they imply.
MicrophoneTypeSensitivityGain you wantBooster?
Audio-Technica AT2035Condenser-33 dB~40 dBNever
Rode NT1 5th GenerationCondenser-32 dB~40 dBNever
Audio-Technica BP40Dynamic-48 dB~48 dBNo
Shure SM58Dynamic-54.5 dBV/Pa~52 dBNo
Rode PodMicDynamic-57 dBV/Pa~58 dBBorderline
Shure SM7BDynamic-59.0 dBV/Pa~60 dBBelow 58 dB, yes

The six XLR microphones, ranked

Ordered by how likely each is to be the right single purchase, not by price and not by prestige.

#1

Audio-Technica AT2035

Top pick

Audio-Technica · The value condenser with the switches you actually need

The condenser to buy if you are choosing on value: the high-pass filter and the 8 dB quieter noise floor are worth more in a real room than anything else in this price band. Skip it if you have not treated the room, in which case a dynamic is the better purchase.

Why it is here

  • 12 dB self-noise against the AT2020's 20 dB is an audible 8 dB of quiet for a small price step
  • The 80 Hz high-pass is the single most useful switch on a desk-mounted condenser
  • Ships with a real shockmount, not a plastic clip

What it costs you

  • Still a condenser, so the room rules apply
  • Slightly forward upper midrange that some voices find harsh
  • The 10 dB pad is mostly irrelevant for voice work
Published specifications for the Audio-Technica AT2035, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeCardioid condenser, side-addressspec
Self-noise12 dB SPLspec
Sensitivity-33 dB (22.4 mV) ref 1 V at 1 Paspec
Max SPL148 dB, or 158 dB with the padspec
ControlsSwitchable 80 Hz high-pass and 10 dB padspec
#2

Rode PodMic

Rode · The best value in a broadcast dynamic

The pick for most people upgrading from a USB mic: it gets you 90 percent of the broadcast-dynamic sound without the booster arithmetic. Choose the SM7B instead if your voice is already bass-heavy and you want the bass-rolloff switch.

Why it is here

  • At -57 dBV/Pa it needs about 2 dB less gain than an SM7B, which is enough to matter on a 58 dB interface
  • Internal pop filter means one less thing clamped to your arm
  • All-metal body at a fraction of the SM7B's price

What it costs you

  • Voiced with more low-mid weight than the SM7B, so a boomy voice can get boomier
  • No voicing switches, so you fix tone in the DAW rather than on the mic
  • Still low enough output that a 55 dB interface will be working hard
Published specifications for the Rode PodMic, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-57 dB re 1 V/Pa (1.60 mV at 94 dB SPL)spec
Frequency range20 Hz to 20 kHzspec
Output impedance320 ohmsspec
Built inInternal pop filter and internal shockmountspec
#3

Shure SM7B

Shure · The default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it

Buy it if your interface supplies 60 dB or more of clean gain, or if you are budgeting for a booster alongside it. Buy something else if your only interface is a Scarlett Solo and you are not prepared to add hardware.

Why it is here

  • Rejects room and computer-fan noise better than any condenser at any price
  • Two voicing switches let one mic cover a thin voice and a boomy one
  • Internal shockmount and a yoke that actually holds position on a boom arm

What it costs you

  • At -59.0 dBV/Pa it is one of the quietest mics sold, so it demands a loud preamp
  • Total cost is the mic plus, very often, a booster
  • Heavy enough that a cheap desk arm will droop under it
Published specifications for the Shure SM7B, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa (1.12 mV)spec
Output impedance150 ohmsspec
Voicing controlsBass rolloff and presence boost switchesspec
#4

Rode NT1 5th Generation

Rode · The quietest capsule most home studios can justify

The right condenser if you have treated the room, or are about to. If your room is bare drywall, the 4 dBA noise floor is irrelevant because the loudest thing on the recording will be the room.

Why it is here

  • 4 dBA self-noise is quieter than the room you are recording in, which is the whole point of a condenser
  • -32 dB sensitivity means no interface on this site struggles to drive it
  • 32-bit float over USB makes clipping a non-event on the digital path

What it costs you

  • A condenser hears your room, your keyboard and your fridge — treatment is not optional
  • The USB path duplicates an interface you probably also want
  • Bright enough that a sibilant voice needs a de-esser
Published specifications for the Rode NT1 5th Generation, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Type1-inch condenser, cardioidspec
Self-noise4 dBAspec
Sensitivity-32 dB re 1 V/Pa (25 mV)spec
Max SPL142 dBspec
ConnectionXLR plus USB-C in the same connector, 32-bit floatspec
#5

Audio-Technica BP40

Audio-Technica · Tighter pickup than a cardioid in a live room

The pick when your problem is a live-sounding room and a weak preamp at the same time: the narrow pattern and the hot output solve both. Avoid it if you or your guests cannot stay on-axis.

Why it is here

  • At -48 dB it is dramatically hotter than an SM7B and needs no booster on anything modern
  • Hypercardioid pattern narrows the pickup further than the cardioid competition
  • Switchable 100 Hz rolloff at 6 dB/octave for close work

What it costs you

  • 632 g needs a serious arm or stand
  • Hypercardioid punishes sloppy mic technique — step off-axis and you vanish
  • Voiced large and forward, which is not every voice's friend
Published specifications for the Audio-Technica BP40, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, hypercardioid, 37 mm capsulespec
Sensitivity-48 dB (3.9 mV) re 1 V at 1 Paspec
Frequency response50 Hz to 16,000 Hzspec
Impedance450 ohmsspec
Weight632 gspec
#6

Shure SM58

Shure · The cheapest way to hear what a dynamic does for you

The right first XLR mic if the real question is whether a dynamic fixes your room, because it answers that for very little money on the interface you already own. It is a diagnostic, not a destination.

Why it is here

  • At -54.5 dBV/Pa it is the hottest dynamic here, and works on genuinely modest preamps
  • Light enough for any stand or arm you already own
  • Effectively indestructible, and resells for most of what you paid

What it costs you

  • Response stops at 15 kHz and it is voiced for a PA, not a studio
  • Handheld grille shape is awkward on a desk boom
  • You will outgrow it if voice is your main output
Published specifications for the Shure SM58, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-54.5 dBV/Pa (1.85 mV) at 1 kHzspec
Frequency response50 Hz to 15,000 Hzspec
Rated impedance150 ohmsspec
Net weight298 gspec

What we did not pick, and why

  • USB and hybrid microphones. If you are searching for an XLR microphone you have already decided the converter should be a separate, replaceable part. USB vs XLR covers the trade honestly, and the MV7+ if you want both.
  • Ribbon microphones. Lovely on some sources and a bad first XLR purchase: quieter than everything here, fragile, and a phantom-power mistake can destroy one.
  • The Rode Procaster. A capable broadcast dynamic, but we could not verify its published sensitivity from a manufacturer source, and this entire ranking turns on that figure. We would rather leave it off than print a number we cannot cite.
  • Handheld stage dynamics other than the SM58. Built to survive being dropped and to reject feedback, not to sound good on a desk. The SM58 is here as a deliberate cheap all-rounder.
  • Anything above the NT1's tier. Past that point the room dominates, and the money belongs in treatment.

Pair it with

How to choose, in three questions

  1. Is your room treated, or will it be? No means a dynamic — the PodMic, or the BP40 if your interface's gain is low. Yes means the AT2035 or the NT1.
  2. What is your interface's published maximum mic gain? Under 58 dB rules out the SM7B without a booster. Look the number up rather than estimating it.
  3. Will you record anything other than speech? Yes pushes you to a condenser for the bandwidth and the detail. No means a broadcast dynamic is the more flattering, more forgiving choice.
A podcast microphone connected at a desk workstation
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

What is a good XLR microphone?
For most people the Audio-Technica AT2035 — it is versatile across voice and instruments, has the filter and pad that matter in a real room, and needs no booster. If your room is untreated, the Rode PodMic is the better answer because it rejects what the AT2035 captures.
Are XLR microphones better than USB?
Not because of the connector. The capsule and preamp decide the sound. What XLR buys is the ability to improve one part of the chain at a time — a better preamp, a booster, a second microphone — without replacing everything. The full comparison.
Do all XLR microphones need phantom power?
No. Condensers do; dynamics do not. You may still need phantom power for an inline booster sitting behind a dynamic, which is a common source of confusion — the phantom powers the booster, not the microphone.
What is the cheapest good XLR microphone?
The Shure SM58 is the cheapest one here that is genuinely good at what it does, and it is hot enough to work on any interface. Its response stops at 15 kHz and its handheld shape is awkward on a desk boom, so treat it as a fine starting point rather than a destination.
Do I need an audio interface for an XLR microphone?
Yes — something has to supply the preamp and, for a condenser, the phantom power. Do I need an audio interface covers the options, including where a cheap adapter falls short.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.