Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best Audio Interfaces for PC

On Windows the driver matters as much as the converter. Ranked on published gain and on whose ASIO drivers have actually held up.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best Audio Interfaces for PC: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)The most gain per dollar in a two-input box
Max mic gain69 dB8.7
2
Steinberg UR22CWindows driver quality and a hardware loopback switch
Conversion32-bit / 192 kHz8.4
3
MOTU M2The best converters and metering at the price
Mic input EIN-129 dB8.8
4
SSL 2+ MKIITwo headphone outs and a console voicing
Mic gain range64 dB9.0
5
Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HDThe floor of the category, honestly described
Conversion24-bit / 192 kHz7.3

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) is the best interface for a Windows PC: 69 dB of published mic gain is the most at its price, 120 dB dynamic range means the converters are not the limit, and Focusrite's ASIO drivers are the most mature in this price band.

Windows is the one platform where the driver is a real part of the purchase. macOS interfaces are class-compliant and simply appear; Windows needs an ASIO driver to get usable latency, and the quality of that driver is entirely down to the manufacturer. A box with excellent converters and a flaky driver is a worse buy than a modest box with a solid one.

What actually differs on Windows

  • A real ASIO driver, not ASIO4ALL. ASIO4ALL is a wrapper around the generic Windows driver. It works, and it is a fallback rather than a feature. Every interface here ships a native ASIO driver.
  • Stable low buffer sizes. The number that matters is not the lowest buffer the driver will accept, but the lowest it holds without crackling for an hour.
  • Driver longevity. Windows updates break audio drivers. What you want is a manufacturer that has kept shipping updates for old hardware, which is a track record rather than a specification.
  • USB chipset tolerance. Some interfaces are noticeably fussier about which USB controller they are plugged into. A rear-panel port directly on the motherboard is always the better bet than a front-panel or hub port.
Published figures and the Windows-specific consideration for each. Gain and dynamic-range figures are manufacturer published; the driver column is a statement about track record, not a measurement.
InterfaceMax mic gainWindows driver notesLoopback
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)69 dBMature ASIO, longest update history hereYes
Steinberg UR22CNot publishedYamaha-lineage drivers, historically very stableHardware switch
MOTU M2Not publishedNative ASIO, strong reputationSoftware
SSL 2+ MKII64 dBNative ASIOYes
Behringer UMC204HDNot publishedWeakest driver experience hereNo

The five interfaces, ranked for Windows

#1

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)

Top pick

Focusrite · The most gain per dollar in a two-input box

The default answer for someone buying an SM7B or PodMic: it supplies enough clean gain that you never need a booster, which makes it the cheaper total purchase even when it is not the cheaper box. Look elsewhere only if you need MIDI or four outputs.

Why it is here

  • 69 dB is the most gain of any interface at this price, and enough for an SM7B with headroom to spare
  • 120 dB dynamic range means the converters are not the weak link
  • Two inputs, so a second person does not mean a second purchase

What it costs you

  • Air mode is a fixed voicing, not an EQ you can dial
  • Plastic-and-metal build feels less solid than the SSL or Audient competition
  • No MIDI, which matters if you also play keys
Published specifications for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen), with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain69 dBspec
Dynamic range120 dBspec
Inputs2 XLR/TRS combo with independent 48 Vspec
VoicingAir modespec
#2

Steinberg UR22C

Steinberg · Windows driver quality and a hardware loopback switch

The pick on Windows if driver stability and a physical loopback switch matter to you. The missing gain figure makes it a gamble with a low-output broadcast dynamic — pair it with a hot microphone.

Why it is here

  • A hardware loopback switch rather than a software setting, which is the difference between streaming working and streaming needing a manual
  • Yamaha-lineage Windows drivers, historically the most stable in this price band
  • MIDI in and out plus onboard DSP monitoring FX

What it costs you

  • Steinberg does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure, so you cannot plan a gain budget for a quiet dynamic
  • The DSP FX are monitoring-only and add nothing to the recording
  • 32-bit conversion is a headline number rather than an audible advantage
Published specifications for the Steinberg UR22C, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Conversion32-bit / 192 kHzspec
PreampsClass-A D-PREspec
MIDI5-pin DIN in and outspec
LoopbackHardware switch on the boxspec
DSPOnboard SSP3 chip for latency-free monitoring FXspec
#3

MOTU M2

MOTU · The best converters and metering at the price

The pick if you care most about conversion quality and want to see your levels without alt-tabbing. If your mic is an SM7B and you want a published gain number you can check against the mic's sensitivity, the 2i2 is the safer buy.

Why it is here

  • -129 dB EIN is genuinely quiet, and it shows on low-output dynamics
  • Full-color LCD metering on the box is more useful day to day than any software mixer
  • Independent phantom power and monitor switching per input

What it costs you

  • MOTU does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure the way Focusrite does, so gain headroom is harder to plan around
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
  • Loopback needs the software, not a front-panel switch
Published specifications for the MOTU M2, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic input EIN-129 dBspec
Mic input dynamic range115 dBspec
Main output dynamic range120 dBspec
ConvertersESS Sabre32 Ultra DACspec
Sample rates44.1 to 192 kHzspec
#4

SSL 2+ MKII

Solid State Logic · Two headphone outs and a console voicing

Buy it for the second headphone output if you record with anyone else in the room — that single feature is worth the premium. For solo work the 2i2 gives you more gain for less money.

Why it is here

  • 64 dB of gain clears an SM7B without a booster
  • Two independent headphone outputs is the feature that makes a two-person recording workable
  • The 4K switch is a real, usable top-end lift rather than a marketing mode

What it costs you

  • Costs meaningfully more than a 2i2 for 5 dB less gain
  • Four outputs are wasted if you only own one pair of monitors
  • Larger footprint than the rest of this group
Published specifications for the SSL 2+ MKII, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain range64 dBspec
Conversion32-bit / 192 kHzspec
Dynamic range116.5 dBspec
VoicingLegacy 4K switch per inputspec
Outputs4 balanced quarter-inch, 2 independent headphone outsspec
#5

Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HD

Behringer · The floor of the category, honestly described

Buy it when the alternative is not recording at all, and plan to replace it. With no published gain figure it is a gamble with any low-output dynamic — pair it with a hot mic or not at all.

Why it is here

  • Cheapest two-input interface worth plugging a real mic into
  • Two combo inputs and phantom power at a price nothing else matches
  • Inserts on the inputs, which is unusual this low

What it costs you

  • Behringer does not publish a maximum gain figure, so you cannot plan a gain budget from the spec sheet
  • Driver experience is the weakest in this group
  • Build reflects the price
Published specifications for the Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HD, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Conversion24-bit / 192 kHzspec
Inputs2 XLR/TRS combo with Midas-designed preampsspec
Phantom power+48 Vspec

What we did not pick, and why

  • Interfaces that rely on ASIO4ALL. If a manufacturer does not ship a native Windows driver at this price, that tells you where the product sits.
  • Gaming sound cards and headsets. They cannot accept an XLR microphone at all — see audio interface vs sound card.
  • Thunderbolt-only interfaces. Thunderbolt on Windows is far less universal than on a Mac, and a Thunderbolt box on a machine without a certified port is an expensive paperweight.
  • Anything that publishes neither a gain figure nor a dynamic-range figure. There is nothing left to evaluate.

Pair it with

  • A microphone the box can drive. Best XLR microphones, and check the sensitivity against the gain figure.
  • A rear USB port on the motherboard, not a front-panel or hub port. Free, and it resolves a surprising share of crackle complaints.
  • Headphones the output can drive. Best headphones for mixing — a 300 ohm pair is a real load.

How to choose

  1. If your microphone is a low-output dynamic, take the Scarlett 2i2. 69 dB published, and you can plan against it.
  2. If you stream and want loopback you can flick rather than configure, take the UR22C — a hardware switch beats a software setting.
  3. If conversion quality is your priority and your mic is hot, take the MOTU M2.
  4. If you record with someone else, take the SSL 2+ MKII for its two independent headphone outputs.
  5. Only take the UMC204HD if the alternative is not recording, and expect to replace it.
A desktop USB audio interface with gain knobs and an XLR input
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best audio interface for a PC?
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) — 69 dB of published mic gain, 120 dB dynamic range, and the most mature ASIO drivers in this price band. The Steinberg UR22C is the alternative if a hardware loopback switch matters to you.
Do I need ASIO drivers on Windows?
For usable low-latency recording, yes. ASIO4ALL is a wrapper around the generic Windows driver and works as a fallback, but a native ASIO driver from the manufacturer is what you are paying for. Every interface on this page ships one.
Why does my interface crackle on Windows?
Usually buffer size set too low, a USB power-saving setting, or a front-panel or hub USB port. Try a rear port directly on the motherboard first — it costs nothing and resolves a large share of cases.
Is a Mac better than a PC for recording?
Not inherently. macOS interfaces are class-compliant so there is no driver to install, which removes a whole category of problem — but a Windows machine with a native ASIO driver and a sensible buffer performs comparably. See best interfaces for Mac.
Does the interface improve my PC's sound quality?
For recording, yes — it supplies a proper mic preamp and phantom power that no sound card has. For playback it gives you balanced outputs and a headphone amp with real voltage swing. It does not change your room or your microphone.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.