Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best Audio Interfaces Under $100

An honest look at the bottom of the category: what you give up, what still works, and the one that tells you its gain figure.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best Audio Interfaces Under $100: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
M-Audio M-Track SoloA published gain figure under $100
Max mic gain54 dB7.1
2
Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HDThe floor of the category, honestly described
Conversion24-bit / 192 kHz7.3
3
M-Audio M-Track DuoTwo inputs for the price of most single-input boxes
Max mic gain54 dB7.3
4
Behringer U-Phoria UMC22The cheapest box with phantom power
Conversion16-bit / 48 kHz6.7

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The M-Audio M-Track Solo is the most honest interface under $100, because it is the only one here that publishes its gain figure — 54 dB. At this price the specification you cannot get is usually the one you need, and a number you can plan against is worth more than a feature you cannot verify.

None of that makes these unusable. A quiet room, a hot microphone and one of these boxes will produce a perfectly respectable recording, and buying one beats not recording. But the honest framing is that this is the tier where you accept known limitations, not the tier where you get a bargain.

Published figures. “Not published” means the manufacturer states no figure — we have not estimated one. Sources on each product card.
InterfaceMax mic gainConversionMic inputsPhantom power
M-Audio M-Track Solo54 dB16-bit / 48 kHz1Yes
Behringer UMC204HDNot published24-bit / 192 kHz2Yes
M-Audio M-Track Duo54 dB16-bit / 48 kHz2Yes
Behringer UMC22Not published16-bit / 48 kHz1Yes

The UMC204HD is the interesting one: it is the only 24-bit / 192 kHz box here and it has two mic inputs, which on paper makes it the most capable. It publishes no gain figure, which on this site is a significant mark against it — so it ranks second rather than first.

The four interfaces under $100, ranked

#1

M-Audio M-Track Solo

Top pick

M-Audio · A published gain figure under $100

The most honest sub-$100 interface, because it tells you what it can do. Pair it with a hot microphone and it is a genuinely usable first chain; pair it with a broadcast dynamic and it will disappoint.

Why it is here

  • It publishes its gain figure, which almost nothing else under $100 does — `54 dB` is a number you can plan against
  • USB bus powered and genuinely pocketable
  • Clean, neutral preamp with no attempt at color

What it costs you

  • 16-bit conversion, same ceiling as the cheap Behringers
  • `54 dB` is not enough for an SM7B-class dynamic
  • One microphone input only
Published specifications for the M-Audio M-Track Solo, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain54 dB (44 dB line/instrument)spec
Conversion16-bit, up to 48 kHzspec
Signal-to-noise109 dBspec
Frequency response20 Hz - 20 kHzspec
Inputs1 combo Crystal preamp with +48 V, plus switchable line/instrumentspec
#2

Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HD

Behringer · The floor of the category, honestly described

Buy it when the alternative is not recording at all, and plan to replace it. With no published gain figure it is a gamble with any low-output dynamic — pair it with a hot mic or not at all.

Why it is here

  • Cheapest two-input interface worth plugging a real mic into
  • Two combo inputs and phantom power at a price nothing else matches
  • Inserts on the inputs, which is unusual this low

What it costs you

  • Behringer does not publish a maximum gain figure, so you cannot plan a gain budget from the spec sheet
  • Driver experience is the weakest in this group
  • Build reflects the price
Published specifications for the Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HD, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Conversion24-bit / 192 kHzspec
Inputs2 XLR/TRS combo with Midas-designed preampsspec
Phantom power+48 Vspec
#3

M-Audio M-Track Duo

M-Audio · Two inputs for the price of most single-input boxes

The cheapest way to record two microphones at once, with the large caveat that only one of you can monitor. For a serious two-person setup the headphone count matters more than the price.

Why it is here

  • Two combo preamps under $100, which is close to unique
  • Same published `54 dB` gain figure as the Solo
  • Bus powered, so a second voice costs you nothing in desk space

What it costs you

  • One headphone output, so the second person cannot hear themselves
  • 16-bit conversion
  • `54 dB` rules out the low-output dynamics most podcasters want
Published specifications for the M-Audio M-Track Duo, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain54 dBspec
Conversion16-bit, up to 48 kHzspec
Signal-to-noise109 dBspec
Inputs2 combo Crystal preamps with +48 Vspec
PowerUSB bus poweredspec
#4

Behringer U-Phoria UMC22

Behringer · The cheapest box with phantom power

Buy it only when the alternative is not recording at all, and pair it with a hot microphone. The 16-bit converter is the reason to step up to the UMC204HD or an M-Track as soon as you can.

Why it is here

  • About the cheapest way to get an XLR microphone and phantom power into a computer
  • A separate instrument input means a microphone and a guitar at once
  • Direct monitoring, so you can hear yourself without software latency

What it costs you

  • **16-bit / 48 kHz conversion** — the one genuine technical limitation at this price, and it caps your headroom for quiet sources
  • Behringer publishes no maximum mic-gain figure, so a low-output dynamic is unplannable
  • Build and drivers reflect the price
Published specifications for the Behringer U-Phoria UMC22, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Conversion16-bit / 48 kHz AD/DAspec
PreampMidas-designed, +48 V phantomspec
Inputs1 XLR/TRS combo plus a separate Hi-Z instrument inputspec
MonitoringDirect monitoring switchspec

The microphone pairing that ruins this price tier

54 dB of gain is not enough for a low-output broadcast dynamic. An SM7B at -59.0 dBV/Pa wants about 60 dB, so on an M-Track you will be at the top of the knob listening to preamp hiss. That combination — famous microphone, cheapest interface — is the single most common disappointing first purchase in home recording.

Pair a sub-$100 interface with a hot microphone instead: the Audio-Technica BP40 at -48 dB, the Shure SM58 at -54.5 dBV/Pa, the Elgato Wave DX at -52 dBV/Pa, or any condenser — condensers sit around -33 dB and never have a gain problem.

What we did not pick, and why

  • Anything over the cap. This page respects its ceiling. The Scarlett Solo and 2i2 sit above it and are the obvious step up.
  • Unbranded interfaces with no published specifications at all. Cheap is not the problem; unverifiable is. If a manufacturer publishes nothing, there is nothing to rank.
  • XLR-to-USB cables and dongles. Usually not enough gain and often no phantom power. XLR to USB adapters explained.
  • Interfaces without phantom power. That rules out every condenser and every inline booster, which is most of the reason to own an interface.
  • Bundles that include a microphone. The included microphone is chosen on cost and you will replace it. Buy the interface and choose the microphone separately.

Pair it with

  • A hot microphone. Best XLR microphones lists sensitivity for every pick, which is the number that matters here.
  • A quiet room. 16-bit conversion leaves less headroom, so a noisy room costs you more at this price than it would higher up. Acoustic treatment on a budget.
  • Headphones that are easy to drive. A 300 ohm pair will sound thin from a budget headphone output. Best headphones for mixing.

How to choose

  1. If you want a gain figure you can plan against, take the M-Track Solo.
  2. If you want 24-bit conversion and two inputs, take the UMC204HD — and pair it with a hot microphone, because the gain is unpublished.
  3. If you need to record two people at once on this budget, take the M-Track Duo — but note only one of you can monitor.
  4. Only take the UMC22 if it is the cheapest thing that will work, and treat it as temporary.
  5. If you can stretch past the cap, do. The $200 tier fixes both the gain and the converter problem at once.
A desktop USB audio interface with gain knobs and an XLR input
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best audio interface under $100?
The M-Audio M-Track Solo, because it publishes its 54 dB gain figure and nothing else at this price does. The Behringer UMC204HD is more capable on paper — 24-bit and two inputs — but publishes no gain figure at all.
Are cheap audio interfaces any good?
Good enough to make a respectable recording with a hot microphone in a quiet room. The two real compromises at this price are 16-bit conversion on most of them and unpublished gain figures on some, both of which matter most if your microphone is a low-output dynamic.
Can I use an SM7B with a $100 interface?
Not well. The SM7B wants about 60 dB of clean gain and these boxes supply 54 dB or an unpublished amount. You would need a booster, which costs more than the interface — at which point a $200 interface is the cheaper total purchase.
Is 16-bit conversion a problem?
It reduces your headroom, which matters most on quiet sources you then compress. In practice it is a reason to upgrade eventually rather than a reason not to start. The UMC204HD is the only 24-bit option under $100 here.
What should I buy if I can spend a bit more?
The step to roughly $200 fixes both problems at once — 24-bit conversion and, in the Scarlett 2i2's case, 69 dB of published gain that drives any microphone on this site. See best audio interfaces under $200.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.