Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best Audio Interfaces for Multiple Mics

Ranked on mic preamps that actually exist, not on the number in the product name.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best Audio Interfaces for Multiple Mics: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Zoom PodTrak P4Four mics, four headphone outs, battery power
Preamp gain70 dB9.0
2
Rode RodeCaster Pro IIA multi-guest show with no engineer
Preamp gain76 dB9.1
3
SSL 2+ MKIITwo headphone outs and a console voicing
Mic gain range64 dB9.0
4
Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (4th Gen)The most gain, plus MIDI and loopback
Max mic gain69 dB9.2
5
MOTU M4Four channels, MIDI and the best converters here
Max mic gain60 dB9.1

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The Zoom PodTrak P4 is the best device for recording multiple microphones: four mic inputs with up to 70 dB of gain and — the part that actually matters — four independent headphone outputs. For two microphones, the SSL 2+ MKII is the pick, because its 64 dB of gain and two separate headphone outs mean both people can hear themselves.

Mic preamp count and published maximum gain for all five, from the manufacturer sources listed below. The mic-preamp column is the one that decides whether a device belongs on this page.
DeviceMic preampsPublished max gainWhat it adds
Zoom PodTrak P44Up to 70 dBFour independent headphone outputs, battery power
Rode RodeCaster Pro II476 dBSix faders, onboard processing, records to its own storage
SSL 2+ MKII264 dBTwo independent headphone outs, 4K voicing switch
Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (4th Gen)269 dBMIDI, loopback, four line outputs
MOTU M4260 dBTwo extra line inputs, MIDI, full-color LCD metering

The headphone count is the real bottleneck

Everyone shopping for a multi-microphone setup counts XLR sockets. Almost nobody counts headphone jacks, and that is the thing that ruins group recordings. If two people share one headphone output through a splitter, they share one level — so the quiet guest and the loud host cannot both be comfortable, and whoever is uncomfortable moves off-mic to compensate.

That is why the PodTrak P4 tops this list despite being the cheapest and least sophisticated device here. Four preamps and four independently levelled headphone feeds is the whole job of a group recorder, and nothing else at the price does it. It is also why the SSL 2+ MKII wins the two-microphone case over interfaces with more gain: a second headphone output changes what is possible in the room.

What to look for, in order

  1. Mic preamps, counted honestly. Read the I/O list, not the model name. Two combo inputs means two microphones, whatever the box is called.
  2. Headphone outputs, one per person. This is the second count, and the one people discover too late.
  3. Published gain for the microphones you own. Group podcasting usually means broadcast dynamics, which are the hungriest microphones there are. How much clean gain do you need has the table.
  4. Independent phantom power, if some microphones are condensers and some are not. Switching 48 V globally is a nuisance on a mixed setup.
  5. Whether it records without a computer. Both four-preamp devices here do. For a remote interview, that is the difference between an episode and a lost afternoon.
  6. Channel count over USB, if you plan to stream rather than record. The PodTrak P4 sends only two channels to the computer, which rules out a four-mic live stream.

The five devices, ranked

Two genuine four-microphone recorders, then the best two-microphone interfaces — ordered by how many people they let you record properly rather than by price.

#1

Zoom PodTrak P4

Top pick

Zoom · Four mics, four headphone outs, battery power

The best value in group podcast recording: four hot preamps and four headphone feeds is the whole job. Step up to the RodeCaster Pro II only if you need live mixing rather than multitrack capture.

Why it is here

  • 70 dB of gain feeds four SM7Bs, which nothing else at this price does
  • Four headphone outputs with individual level control — the actual bottleneck in group recording
  • Runs on AA batteries, so it records anywhere

What it costs you

  • No faders, no onboard EQ or compression
  • Only 2 channels reach the computer over USB, so live-streaming four separate mics is out
  • Plastic build and a small screen
Published specifications for the Zoom PodTrak P4, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Preamp gainUp to 70 dBspec
Channels4-channel recorderspec
Headphones4 independent headphone outputsspec
Computer use2-in / 2-out USB interfacespec
#2

Rode RodeCaster Pro II

Rode · A multi-guest show with no engineer

The right purchase when you regularly record three or four people and post-production time is your real constraint. For one or two voices an interface plus a DAW does the same job for a fraction of the money.

Why it is here

  • 76 dB of gain and -131.5 dBV EIN means any microphone on this site works with room to spare
  • Six physical faders and onboard processing let one person run a four-person show live
  • Records multitrack to its own storage, so a laptop crash is not a lost episode

What it costs you

  • Far more money than an interface, and most of it buys features a solo host never uses
  • The onboard processing is a commitment unless you record raw tracks alongside
  • Big, and it owns your desk
Published specifications for the Rode RodeCaster Pro II, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Preamp gain76 dBspec
EIN-131.5 dBVspec
ChannelsNine assignable, six physical fadersspec
Recording24-bit fixed or 32-bit float WAV, or MP3spec
#3

SSL 2+ MKII

Solid State Logic · Two headphone outs and a console voicing

Buy it for the second headphone output if you record with anyone else in the room — that single feature is worth the premium. For solo work the 2i2 gives you more gain for less money.

Why it is here

  • 64 dB of gain clears an SM7B without a booster
  • Two independent headphone outputs is the feature that makes a two-person recording workable
  • The 4K switch is a real, usable top-end lift rather than a marketing mode

What it costs you

  • Costs meaningfully more than a 2i2 for 5 dB less gain
  • Four outputs are wasted if you only own one pair of monitors
  • Larger footprint than the rest of this group
Published specifications for the SSL 2+ MKII, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain range64 dBspec
Conversion32-bit / 192 kHzspec
Dynamic range116.5 dBspec
VoicingLegacy 4K switch per inputspec
Outputs4 balanced quarter-inch, 2 independent headphone outsspec
#4

Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (4th Gen)

Focusrite · The most gain, plus MIDI and loopback

The most complete interface under $500 for someone who records voice and plays keys and streams. If you do none of those extra things, the 2i2 has identical gain for less money.

Why it is here

  • `69 dB` of gain, the same as the 2i2, so no microphone on this site needs a booster
  • MIDI and loopback in one box — the two features that usually force a second purchase
  • Four line outputs, so monitors and a separate headphone amp can both be fed

What it costs you

  • Costs meaningfully more than the 2i2 for features a solo voice recordist may never touch
  • Still only two mic preamps despite the four-in name
  • Larger footprint than the desktop boxes
Published specifications for the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (4th Gen), with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain69 dB gain rangespec
Conversion24-bit / 192 kHz, up to 120 dB dynamic rangespec
MIDIIn and outspec
LoopbackYesspec
I/O2 mic pre, 2 instrument, 4 line in, 4 line outspec
#5

MOTU M4

MOTU · Four channels, MIDI and the best converters here

The pick if you want MOTU's conversion plus MIDI and a couple of extra line inputs. If you only ever record one or two microphones and do not need MIDI, the M2 does the same job for less.

Why it is here

  • 60 dB of published gain and `-129 dBu` EIN is a genuinely quiet channel, and unlike the M2 the figure is published
  • MIDI in and out on a box this size saves a separate interface if you play keys
  • Full-color LCD metering for all four channels, which is more useful daily than any software mixer

What it costs you

  • 60 dB is enough for an SM7B but without much headroom to spare
  • Two of the four inputs are line-only, so it is not a four-microphone box
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
Published specifications for the MOTU M4, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain60 dBspec
Mic input EIN-129 dBuspec
Dynamic range120 dB (ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC)spec
MIDI1 in, 1 out (5-pin DIN)spec
I/O2 XLR/TRS combo mic/line/Hi-Z plus 2 balanced line in, 4 outspec

Two mics, three mics, four mics

  • Two microphones, both monitoring. SSL 2+ MKII. 64 dB of gain and two headphone outputs is the complete answer, and the 4K switch is a usable bonus.
  • Two microphones, plus MIDI or streaming. Scarlett 4i4. 69 dB is the most gain here and loopback saves a software workaround. One headphone output, so plan for that.
  • Three or four microphones, recorded. PodTrak P4. Four preamps, four headphone feeds, runs on batteries.
  • Three or four microphones, mixed live. RodeCaster Pro II. 76 dB of gain, six faders and onboard processing — the right tool when post-production time is your constraint rather than money.

What we did not pick, and why

  • Two interfaces aggregated together. Possible on macOS and awkward on Windows, and clock drift between two separate converters causes real problems over a long recording. Buy one device with the inputs you need.
  • A mixer feeding a two-input interface. A legitimate approach, with the catch that you commit to the mix during the recording. Audio interface vs mixer covers where it does and does not make sense.
  • The M-Audio M-Track Duo. Two preamps under $100, and only one headphone output — so the second person cannot hear themselves. It is covered in best audio interfaces under $100.
  • Rack-mount eight-channel interfaces. A different category with a different buyer. If you are recording a drum kit rather than a conversation, this is not your page.

What to buy alongside it

A multi-channel podcast mixing console with faders on a studio desk
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best audio interface for multiple mics?
The Zoom PodTrak P4 for three or four microphones, because it has four preamps and four independent headphone outputs. The SSL 2+ MKII for two microphones, because its second headphone output lets both people monitor at their own level.
Can I record two mics on a 2-in interface?
Yes — two combo inputs means two microphones. The question to ask next is how many headphone outputs it has, because one output shared between two people means one monitoring level for both.
Does a 4-input interface record four microphones?
Usually not. On the Scarlett 4i4 and the MOTU M4, two of the four inputs are line or instrument inputs with no mic preamp and no phantom power. Read the I/O list rather than the model name.
Can I use two audio interfaces at once for more mics?
It is technically possible, and clock drift between two independent converters causes audible problems over a long recording. If you need four microphones, buy a device with four preamps.
What do I need for a four-person podcast?
Four microphones, four preamps, four headphone outputs and four pairs of closed-back headphones. The PodTrak P4 covers the middle two in one box; the RodeCaster Pro II does the same and mixes live.
Can I stream four separate mics?
Not through the PodTrak P4, which sends only two channels to the computer over USB. The RodeCaster Pro II is the device on this page built for that, or a two-preamp interface with loopback for a two-person stream.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.