Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best Audio Interfaces for Streaming

Ranked on loopback and on gain, because getting game audio into the stream and a quiet dynamic up to level are the only two problems that matter.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best Audio Interfaces for Streaming: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Elgato Wave XLRThe most gain of any single-channel box, built for streaming
Gain range0 to 75 dB8.6
2
Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (4th Gen)The most gain, plus MIDI and loopback
Max mic gain69 dB9.2
3
Steinberg UR22CWindows driver quality and a hardware loopback switch
Conversion32-bit / 192 kHz8.4
4
Focusrite Vocaster OneA solo host who does not want to set levels
Mic gain range70 dB8.4
5
Rode RodeCaster Pro IIA multi-guest show with no engineer
Preamp gain76 dB9.1
6
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)The most gain per dollar in a two-input box
Max mic gain69 dB8.7

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The Elgato Wave XLR is the best box for a solo streamer: 0-75 dB of gain drives any microphone on this site with no booster, Clipguard catches the shout that would otherwise clip your take, and tap-to-mute on the top surface beats reaching for a key bind. If you want a general-purpose interface instead, the Scarlett 4i4 has 69 dB plus hardware loopback and MIDI.

Streaming asks two specific things of an interface, and neither is conversion quality.

  • Loopback — routing your computer's own audio (game, music, a guest on a call) back into the stream without a second cable or a second device. Without it you are patching physical outputs into inputs and fighting echo.
  • Enough gain — streamers gravitate to low-output broadcast dynamics, and the most popular of them, the SM7B, wants about 60 dB of clean gain. A box that supplies 55 dB produces the thin, hissy stream audio everyone recognizes.
Published gain and how each box handles loopback. All figures manufacturer published; sources on each product card.
InterfaceMax mic gainLoopbackMic inputsNotes
Elgato Wave XLR75 dBVia Wave Link software mixing1Clipguard, tap-to-mute
Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (4th Gen)69 dBYes2Also MIDI in/out
Steinberg UR22CNot publishedHardware switch2Onboard DSP monitoring
Focusrite Vocaster One70 dBStereo, via Vocaster Hub1Auto Gain, Enhance presets
Rode RodeCaster Pro II76 dBMultichannel USB4Live mixing, faders
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)69 dBYes2The general-purpose baseline

The six interfaces, ranked for streaming

#1

Elgato Wave XLR

Top pick

Elgato · The most gain of any single-channel box, built for streaming

The right box if you stream or record alone with a low-output dynamic and want the gain problem to simply not exist. It is not a general-purpose interface, and it is the wrong buy if you also record instruments.

Why it is here

  • `75 dB` of gain drives an SM7B with room to spare and no booster, which is the single most common streaming problem solved outright
  • Clipguard catches a shout that would otherwise clip the take
  • Capacitive tap-to-mute on the top surface, which is genuinely better than reaching for a key bind

What it costs you

  • One microphone input, so a co-host needs a second unit
  • The mixing lives in Elgato's software, so it is a Wave Link setup rather than a neutral interface
  • No MIDI, no line inputs, no instrument input
Published specifications for the Elgato Wave XLR, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Gain range0 to 75 dBspec
EIN-130 dBV at 60 dB gainspec
Dynamic range100 dB, or 120 dB with Clipguardspec
Phantom power+48 V at 7 mAspec
Conversion24-bit, 48 / 96 kHzspec
#2

Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (4th Gen)

Focusrite · The most gain, plus MIDI and loopback

The most complete interface under $500 for someone who records voice and plays keys and streams. If you do none of those extra things, the 2i2 has identical gain for less money.

Why it is here

  • `69 dB` of gain, the same as the 2i2, so no microphone on this site needs a booster
  • MIDI and loopback in one box — the two features that usually force a second purchase
  • Four line outputs, so monitors and a separate headphone amp can both be fed

What it costs you

  • Costs meaningfully more than the 2i2 for features a solo voice recordist may never touch
  • Still only two mic preamps despite the four-in name
  • Larger footprint than the desktop boxes
Published specifications for the Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 (4th Gen), with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain69 dB gain rangespec
Conversion24-bit / 192 kHz, up to 120 dB dynamic rangespec
MIDIIn and outspec
LoopbackYesspec
I/O2 mic pre, 2 instrument, 4 line in, 4 line outspec
#3

Steinberg UR22C

Steinberg · Windows driver quality and a hardware loopback switch

The pick on Windows if driver stability and a physical loopback switch matter to you. The missing gain figure makes it a gamble with a low-output broadcast dynamic — pair it with a hot microphone.

Why it is here

  • A hardware loopback switch rather than a software setting, which is the difference between streaming working and streaming needing a manual
  • Yamaha-lineage Windows drivers, historically the most stable in this price band
  • MIDI in and out plus onboard DSP monitoring FX

What it costs you

  • Steinberg does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure, so you cannot plan a gain budget for a quiet dynamic
  • The DSP FX are monitoring-only and add nothing to the recording
  • 32-bit conversion is a headline number rather than an audible advantage
Published specifications for the Steinberg UR22C, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Conversion32-bit / 192 kHzspec
PreampsClass-A D-PREspec
MIDI5-pin DIN in and outspec
LoopbackHardware switch on the boxspec
DSPOnboard SSP3 chip for latency-free monitoring FXspec
#4

Focusrite Vocaster One

Focusrite · A solo host who does not want to set levels

The pick for a solo podcaster who wants the gear to get out of the way. If you record music as well as speech, a general-purpose interface with the same gain is the better buy.

Why it is here

  • `70 dB` of gain means any microphone on this site works without a booster
  • Auto Gain removes the single most common beginner mistake in one button press
  • Stereo loopback plus phone and camera connections, which is the actual podcast workflow

What it costs you

  • 24-bit / 48 kHz only, and no instrument input — it is a speech box and nothing else
  • The three Enhance presets are printed into the recording
  • One microphone input; a co-host means the Vocaster Two
Published specifications for the Focusrite Vocaster One, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain range70 dBspec
THD+N<= -94 dB at -1 dBFSspec
Conversion24-bit / 48 kHzspec
AutomationAuto Gain sets the level for youspec
LoopbackStereo loopback via Vocaster Hubspec
#5

Rode RodeCaster Pro II

Rode · A multi-guest show with no engineer

The right purchase when you regularly record three or four people and post-production time is your real constraint. For one or two voices an interface plus a DAW does the same job for a fraction of the money.

Why it is here

  • 76 dB of gain and -131.5 dBV EIN means any microphone on this site works with room to spare
  • Six physical faders and onboard processing let one person run a four-person show live
  • Records multitrack to its own storage, so a laptop crash is not a lost episode

What it costs you

  • Far more money than an interface, and most of it buys features a solo host never uses
  • The onboard processing is a commitment unless you record raw tracks alongside
  • Big, and it owns your desk
Published specifications for the Rode RodeCaster Pro II, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Preamp gain76 dBspec
EIN-131.5 dBVspec
ChannelsNine assignable, six physical fadersspec
Recording24-bit fixed or 32-bit float WAV, or MP3spec
#6

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)

Focusrite · The most gain per dollar in a two-input box

The default answer for someone buying an SM7B or PodMic: it supplies enough clean gain that you never need a booster, which makes it the cheaper total purchase even when it is not the cheaper box. Look elsewhere only if you need MIDI or four outputs.

Why it is here

  • 69 dB is the most gain of any interface at this price, and enough for an SM7B with headroom to spare
  • 120 dB dynamic range means the converters are not the weak link
  • Two inputs, so a second person does not mean a second purchase

What it costs you

  • Air mode is a fixed voicing, not an EQ you can dial
  • Plastic-and-metal build feels less solid than the SSL or Audient competition
  • No MIDI, which matters if you also play keys
Published specifications for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen), with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain69 dBspec
Dynamic range120 dBspec
Inputs2 XLR/TRS combo with independent 48 Vspec
VoicingAir modespec

What we did not pick, and why

  • Gaming headsets and sound cards. They cannot accept an XLR microphone at all — audio interface vs sound card covers why.
  • Interfaces with no loopback. You can bodge it with a physical loop, and you will fight echo and level for as long as you keep doing it.
  • Boxes whose processing is printed into the recording with no clean path. Record clean and process in software, where you can change your mind after the stream.
  • The Behringer UMC204HD. No published gain figure and no loopback, which are precisely the two things this page ranks on.

Pair it with

  • A dynamic microphone, not a condenser. A condenser hears your PC fan and your room in detail. Best dynamic microphones for streaming ranks the options by output level.
  • A low-profile arm. Best boom arms — an arm that stays out of camera frame.
  • Closed-back headphones. Open-backs leak your stream audio back into an open microphone.

How to choose

  1. Solo streamer, one microphone, want the gain problem gone: Wave XLR.
  2. **Want one box for streaming *and* music, including MIDI: Scarlett 4i4.**
  3. Want loopback you flick rather than configure: UR22C — but check your microphone is hot enough, because Steinberg publishes no gain figure.
  4. Solo podcaster who does not want to set levels: Vocaster One, for Auto Gain.
  5. Three or four people on the stream: RodeCaster Pro II, which is a console rather than an interface.
A multi-channel podcast mixing console with faders on a studio desk
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best audio interface for streaming?
The Elgato Wave XLR for a solo streamer — 75 dB of gain, Clipguard and tap-to-mute. The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 if you want a general-purpose interface that also does hardware loopback and MIDI.
What is loopback and do I need it?
Loopback routes your computer's own audio back into the interface so it can be captured in the stream alongside your microphone. Without it you need a physical output-to-input loop and you will fight echo and levels. For streaming, yes, you want it.
Do I need an interface if I already have a USB microphone?
Not necessarily. An interface becomes worth it when you want a broadcast dynamic, more clean gain, loopback, or a second microphone. Do I need an audio interface covers the cases where the honest answer is no.
Why does my stream audio sound quiet and hissy?
Almost always a low-output dynamic on an interface that cannot supply enough clean gain, run near its ceiling. Either move to a box with 69 dB or more, add a booster, or choose a hotter microphone.
Is the RodeCaster Pro II overkill for one person?
Yes. Most of what you are paying for is channels and headphone feeds a solo streamer never uses. It becomes the right purchase at three or more people — see RodeCaster Pro II vs Zoom PodTrak P4.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.