Skip to content
Mic & Mix

Are Cheap Audio Interfaces Worth It?

Yes, if you pair one with a hot microphone and accept 16-bit. The compromise is almost never where reviews say it is.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

Are Cheap Audio Interfaces Worth It?: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
M-Audio M-Track DuoTwo inputs for the price of most single-input boxes
Max mic gain54 dB7.3
2
Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HDThe floor of the category, honestly described
Conversion24-bit / 192 kHz7.3
3
M-Audio M-Track SoloA published gain figure under $100
Max mic gain54 dB7.1
4
Behringer U-Phoria UMC22The cheapest box with phantom power
Conversion16-bit / 48 kHz6.7

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

Cheap audio interfaces are worth it when the alternative is not recording, and when you pair one with a hot microphone. What you lose under $100 is gain headroom and, on most of them, 16-bit conversion — not sound quality in the way reviews imply. Pair a 54 dB interface with a -59.0 dBV/Pa dynamic and it will hiss; pair it with a condenser and the recording is genuinely fine.

The honest version of this question is not whether cheap interfaces are bad. It is which specific compromise you are accepting, because the answer changes what you should buy to go with it.

What you actually lose, in order of how much it matters

  1. Gain headroom. This is the big one and it is the only one that can ruin a recording outright. Budget interfaces top out around 54 dB. A broadcast dynamic wants 60 dB or more. Over the line, you get hiss you cannot remove.
  2. A published gain figure at all. Both Behringer boxes below publish no maximum mic gain, which means you cannot plan a microphone purchase against them. That is a worse problem than a low number.
  3. Bit depth. Three of the four here are 16-bit. That caps your headroom for quiet sources, so you have to track closer to the ceiling than you would like. It is a real limitation and a manageable one.
  4. Driver quality. Harder to quantify and easy to underestimate. The weakest drivers in this tier cost you sessions, not fidelity.
  5. Monitoring and routing. One headphone output, no loopback, no per-channel phantom switching. All inconveniences rather than quality limits.

Note what is not on that list: the converters. Every interface sold in the last decade converts well enough that you will not hear its limits in a domestic room — see audio interface vs DAC for why that is. The cheap-converter story is the wrong story.

The four sub-$100 interfaces on this site, as published. “Not published” means the manufacturer states no maximum mic-gain figure — which is itself a finding.
InterfacePublished max mic gainConversionMic inputs
M-Audio M-Track Duo54 dB16-bit, up to 48 kHz2
Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HDNot published24-bit / 192 kHz2
M-Audio M-Track Solo54 dB16-bit, up to 48 kHz1
Behringer U-Phoria UMC22Not published16-bit / 48 kHz1

For contrast, the Scarlett 2i2 publishes 69 dB of gain and 120 dB of dynamic range. That is the gap you are closing when you spend more — and it is a gap in gain and documentation far more than in conversion.

What to buy

The four cheap interfaces, with what each one costs you

Ranked by how usable the result is rather than by price. The M-Audio boxes publish their gain figure, which is why they rank above the Behringers despite the Behringer UMC204HD having the better converter.

#1

M-Audio M-Track Duo

Top pick

M-Audio · Two inputs for the price of most single-input boxes

The cheapest way to record two microphones at once, with the large caveat that only one of you can monitor. For a serious two-person setup the headphone count matters more than the price.

Why it is here

  • Two combo preamps under $100, which is close to unique
  • Same published `54 dB` gain figure as the Solo
  • Bus powered, so a second voice costs you nothing in desk space

What it costs you

  • One headphone output, so the second person cannot hear themselves
  • 16-bit conversion
  • `54 dB` rules out the low-output dynamics most podcasters want
Published specifications for the M-Audio M-Track Duo, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain54 dBspec
Conversion16-bit, up to 48 kHzspec
Signal-to-noise109 dBspec
Inputs2 combo Crystal preamps with +48 Vspec
PowerUSB bus poweredspec
#2

Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HD

Behringer · The floor of the category, honestly described

Buy it when the alternative is not recording at all, and plan to replace it. With no published gain figure it is a gamble with any low-output dynamic — pair it with a hot mic or not at all.

Why it is here

  • Cheapest two-input interface worth plugging a real mic into
  • Two combo inputs and phantom power at a price nothing else matches
  • Inserts on the inputs, which is unusual this low

What it costs you

  • Behringer does not publish a maximum gain figure, so you cannot plan a gain budget from the spec sheet
  • Driver experience is the weakest in this group
  • Build reflects the price
Published specifications for the Behringer U-Phoria UMC204HD, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Conversion24-bit / 192 kHzspec
Inputs2 XLR/TRS combo with Midas-designed preampsspec
Phantom power+48 Vspec
#3

M-Audio M-Track Solo

M-Audio · A published gain figure under $100

The most honest sub-$100 interface, because it tells you what it can do. Pair it with a hot microphone and it is a genuinely usable first chain; pair it with a broadcast dynamic and it will disappoint.

Why it is here

  • It publishes its gain figure, which almost nothing else under $100 does — `54 dB` is a number you can plan against
  • USB bus powered and genuinely pocketable
  • Clean, neutral preamp with no attempt at color

What it costs you

  • 16-bit conversion, same ceiling as the cheap Behringers
  • `54 dB` is not enough for an SM7B-class dynamic
  • One microphone input only
Published specifications for the M-Audio M-Track Solo, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain54 dB (44 dB line/instrument)spec
Conversion16-bit, up to 48 kHzspec
Signal-to-noise109 dBspec
Frequency response20 Hz - 20 kHzspec
Inputs1 combo Crystal preamp with +48 V, plus switchable line/instrumentspec
#4

Behringer U-Phoria UMC22

Behringer · The cheapest box with phantom power

Buy it only when the alternative is not recording at all, and pair it with a hot microphone. The 16-bit converter is the reason to step up to the UMC204HD or an M-Track as soon as you can.

Why it is here

  • About the cheapest way to get an XLR microphone and phantom power into a computer
  • A separate instrument input means a microphone and a guitar at once
  • Direct monitoring, so you can hear yourself without software latency

What it costs you

  • **16-bit / 48 kHz conversion** — the one genuine technical limitation at this price, and it caps your headroom for quiet sources
  • Behringer publishes no maximum mic-gain figure, so a low-output dynamic is unplannable
  • Build and drivers reflect the price
Published specifications for the Behringer U-Phoria UMC22, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Conversion16-bit / 48 kHz AD/DAspec
PreampMidas-designed, +48 V phantomspec
Inputs1 XLR/TRS combo plus a separate Hi-Z instrument inputspec
MonitoringDirect monitoring switchspec

The pairing rule that makes a cheap interface work

Choose the microphone against the interface, not the other way round. A 54 dB box plus a condenser, an Elgato Wave DX at -52 dBV/Pa, a Shure SM58 or an MV7+ at -55 dBV/Pa is a chain that works. The same box plus an SM7B at -59.0 dBV/Pa is a chain that hisses, and nothing in the DAW fixes it.

That single rule is the difference between a cheap interface being a good decision and a bad one. How much clean gain do you need has the figure for every interface and microphone on this site, and best XLR microphones lists which capsules are hot enough.

Are expensive audio interfaces worth it, then?

For a specific feature, yes. Two headphone outputs for a co-host. MIDI for a hardware synth. Four preamps for a group. 69 dB of gain for a broadcast dynamic. Analog compression on the way in. Each of those is a concrete thing you can check against your own situation.

For "better sound" in the abstract, no — not in an untreated domestic room with a microphone a hand's width from your face. The next real improvement at that point is the room, not the box. Best audio interfaces under $500 is where feature-driven spending starts to make sense.

When a cheap interface is the wrong call

  • You already own a low-output dynamic. Then you are buying a gain problem. Spend on gain instead.
  • You record two people who both need to hear themselves. One headphone output is a hard limit — see best audio interfaces for multiple mics.
  • You need MIDI or loopback. Neither exists at this price, and working around them costs more than the feature.
  • You are paid for this work. Driver reliability becomes the specification that matters, and it is the one the budget tier compromises hardest.
A desktop USB audio interface with gain knobs and an XLR input
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

Are cheap audio interfaces worth it?
Yes, when the alternative is not recording and when you pair one with a hot microphone. The compromise is gain headroom and bit depth, not converter quality — and gain is the one that can ruin a recording.
Do cheap audio interfaces sound worse?
Not meaningfully, on their converters. They sound worse in practice when their preamp runs out of clean gain for the microphone in front of it, which is a pairing fault you can avoid by choosing a hotter microphone.
Is 16-bit conversion a problem?
It is a real limitation rather than a dealbreaker. It caps your headroom, so you record closer to the ceiling and leave less room for a surprise loud moment. The UMC204HD is the one box here at 24-bit / 192 kHz.
Are expensive audio interfaces worth it?
For a specific feature you need — a second headphone output, MIDI, four preamps, 69 dB of gain — yes. For better sound in the abstract, in an untreated room, no.
What is the cheapest interface that works with an SM7B?
On this site, the Scarlett 2i2 at a published 69 dB. Everything cheaper either needs a booster or publishes no gain figure at all, and a booster plus a cheap interface usually costs more than the 2i2.
Should I buy a cheap interface now and upgrade later?
It is a sound plan if you pair it with a microphone that works on it, because the microphone keeps its value when the interface is replaced. It is a poor plan if you buy the microphone first and then discover the interface cannot feed it.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.