Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Alternatives

The 2i2 wins its price class on one published figure. Every alternative here gives that figure up for something, and this page says exactly what.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Alternatives: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
MOTU M2The best converters and metering at the price
Mic input EIN-129 dB8.8
$199.95View on Amazon

#ad How we earn · Price as of November 12, 2026

2
Elgato Wave XLRThe most gain of any single-channel box, built for streaming
Gain range0 to 75 dB8.6
$112.95View on Amazon

#ad How we earn · Price as of November 12, 2026

3
Audient iD4 MKIIThe best-sounding single preamp here
Mic gain range0 to 58 dB8.2
$179.99View on Amazon$269.99−33%

#ad How we earn · Price as of November 12, 2026

4
Audient EVO 4Anyone who keeps getting gain-staging wrong
Mic gain58 dB8.2
$161.29View on Amazon

#ad How we earn · Price as of November 12, 2026

5
MOTU M4Four channels, MIDI and the best converters here
Max mic gain60 dB9.1
$279.95View on Amazon

#ad How we earn · Price as of November 12, 2026

6
Focusrite Vocaster OneA solo host who does not want to set levels
Mic gain range70 dB8.4
$49.99View on Amazon$149.99−67%

#ad How we earn · Price as of November 12, 2026

7
Universal Audio Volt 2A hardware color option on the way in
Mic gain55 dB7.8
$199.00View on Amazon

#ad How we earn · Price as of November 12, 2026

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The MOTU M2 is the best Scarlett 2i2 alternative for most people: two inputs for about the same money, -129 dB EIN and full-color metering on the box instead of in software. If you are leaving the 2i2 because it still is not loud enough, only the Elgato Wave XLR at 75 dB and the Vocaster One at 70 dB beat it.

People search for a Scarlett 2i2 alternative for four quite different reasons, and they do not lead to the same box. Two of those reasons have good answers, one has a better answer than any alternative, and one is usually a mistake. Working out which is yours takes about thirty seconds.

Why people look past the Scarlett 2i2, and where each reason leads.
Your actual reasonWhat to buyWhy
I want better conversion and metering for the same moneyMOTU M2-129 dB EIN, 120 dB output dynamic range and a full-color meter on the front panel
My microphone is still too quiet on itElgato Wave XLR, or the Vocaster One75 dB and 70 dB of published gain against the 2i2's 69 dB
I want the cleanest single channel I can getAudient iD4 MKII-129 dB(A) EIN and 0.0017% THD+N, at the cost of 11 dB less gain
I also play keys and need MIDIMOTU M4MIDI in and out, 60 dB of published gain and two extra line inputs
It costs more than I want to spendAudient EVO 4Two mic preamps and automatic gain setting for less, if your mic is hot enough for 58 dB

If the reason you are here is the second one, read how much clean gain do you need before you buy anything, because the arithmetic usually says the interface is not the thing to replace. An inline booster in front of the 2i2 you already own adds around 25 dB for a fraction of the price of a new interface, and Cloudlifter vs FetHead compares the two that matter.

What the Scarlett 2i2 actually does well

This matters more than it sounds, because an alternative is only an alternative to something specific. Three published properties do the work on the 4th Gen 2i2, and the first is the reason this site keeps recommending it.

  • `69 dB` of maximum mic gain. The highest figure of any general-purpose two-input interface at the price, and enough to drive a Shure SM7B at -59.0 dBV/Pa with headroom left over. Most of the boxes on this page do not reach it.
  • `120 dB` of dynamic range. Enough that the converters are not the limiting factor in a home studio, which moves the argument to features and feel rather than fidelity.
  • Two combo inputs with independent phantom power. A second person, or a microphone and a guitar, without a second purchase.

What it does not have is MIDI, four outputs, a hardware loopback switch, onboard compression or a front-panel meter. Those are the gaps every box below is built to fill, and each one charges you gain, money or channels for it.

Published maximum mic gain, highest first. The 2i2 is the reference row, not a pick.
InterfacePublished max mic gainMic inputs
Elgato Wave XLR75 dB1
Focusrite Vocaster One70 dB1
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (reference)69 dB2
MOTU M460 dB2
Audient iD4 MKII58 dB1
Audient EVO 458 dB2
Universal Audio Volt 255 dB2
MOTU M2Not published2

How these are ranked

  1. Published maximum mic gain, because it is the one specification that can rule a microphone out entirely. A manufacturer who does not publish one is marked as such rather than guessed at.
  2. Published converter figures — EIN, dynamic range, THD+N — taken from the manufacturer's own documentation, linked under Sources.
  3. Inputs and outputs you will use. A second mic preamp counts. A fourth line output on a desk with one pair of monitors does not.
  4. What it removes from the shopping list. A box that replaces a separate purchase, such as MIDI or a booster, is worth more than one that duplicates something you own.
  5. Buyable now. Every pick below had a live listing when this page was written, which is why two interfaces this site rates highly sit in the not-picked list instead.

The seven alternatives, ranked

Ranked best-first for the buyer leaving a 2i2, not by price. Prices update daily, so the figures on the cards are the live ones.

#1

MOTU M2

Top pick

MOTU · The best converters and metering at the price

The pick if you care most about conversion quality and want to see your levels without alt-tabbing. If your mic is an SM7B and you want a published gain number you can check against the mic's sensitivity, the 2i2 is the safer buy.

Why it is here

  • -129 dB EIN is genuinely quiet, and it shows on low-output dynamics
  • Full-color LCD metering on the box is more useful day to day than any software mixer
  • Independent phantom power and monitor switching per input

What it costs you

  • MOTU does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure the way Focusrite does, so gain headroom is harder to plan around
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
  • Loopback needs the software, not a front-panel switch
Published specifications for the MOTU M2, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic input EIN-129 dBspec
Mic input dynamic range115 dBspec
Main output dynamic range120 dBspec
ConvertersESS Sabre32 Ultra DACspec
Sample rates44.1 to 192 kHzspec
#2

Elgato Wave XLR

Elgato · The most gain of any single-channel box, built for streaming

The right box if you stream or record alone with a low-output dynamic and want the gain problem to simply not exist. It is not a general-purpose interface, and it is the wrong buy if you also record instruments.

Why it is here

  • `75 dB` of gain drives an SM7B with room to spare and no booster, which is the single most common streaming problem solved outright
  • Clipguard catches a shout that would otherwise clip the take
  • Capacitive tap-to-mute on the top surface, which is genuinely better than reaching for a key bind

What it costs you

  • One microphone input, so a co-host needs a second unit
  • The mixing lives in Elgato's software, so it is a Wave Link setup rather than a neutral interface
  • No MIDI, no line inputs, no instrument input
Published specifications for the Elgato Wave XLR, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Gain range0 to 75 dBspec
EIN-130 dBV at 60 dB gainspec
Dynamic range100 dB, or 120 dB with Clipguardspec
Phantom power+48 V at 7 mAspec
Conversion24-bit, 48 / 96 kHzspec
#3

Audient iD4 MKII

Audient · The best-sounding single preamp here

The right box if your mic is a condenser or a hot dynamic and you want the cleanest single channel at this price. If you are buying an SM7B, 58 dB puts you straight back into booster territory.

Why it is here

  • -129 dB(A) EIN and 0.0017% THD+N are numbers you would expect a tier up
  • The Class A preamp is the same circuit family as Audient's consoles
  • Two headphone outputs on a one-input box, which is unusual and useful

What it costs you

  • 58 dB is not enough for an SM7B without a booster
  • One mic input only
  • No onboard DSP or voicing
Published specifications for the Audient iD4 MKII, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain range0 to 58 dBspec
EIN-129 dB(A)spec
THD+N0.0017% at 0 dBuspec
PreampAudient Class A console mic preampspec
#4

Audient EVO 4

Audient · Anyone who keeps getting gain-staging wrong

The pick for a second host on a budget, or for anyone whose recordings keep coming back too quiet. Not the pick if your mic is an SM7B, where the gain ceiling forces a booster.

Why it is here

  • Smartgain removes the single most common beginner mistake in one button
  • Two mic preamps at the price of most one-input boxes
  • Genuinely small and bus-powered

What it costs you

  • 58 dB again falls short of an SM7B's appetite
  • Single encoder for everything means more button-pressing than knob-turning
  • Plastic build
Published specifications for the Audient EVO 4, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain58 dBspec
Inputs2 mic preampsspec
AutomationSmartgain sets levels automaticallyspec
#5

MOTU M4

MOTU · Four channels, MIDI and the best converters here

The pick if you want MOTU's conversion plus MIDI and a couple of extra line inputs. If you only ever record one or two microphones and do not need MIDI, the M2 does the same job for less.

Why it is here

  • 60 dB of published gain and `-129 dBu` EIN is a genuinely quiet channel, and unlike the M2 the figure is published
  • MIDI in and out on a box this size saves a separate interface if you play keys
  • Full-color LCD metering for all four channels, which is more useful daily than any software mixer

What it costs you

  • 60 dB is enough for an SM7B but without much headroom to spare
  • Two of the four inputs are line-only, so it is not a four-microphone box
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
Published specifications for the MOTU M4, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain60 dBspec
Mic input EIN-129 dBuspec
Dynamic range120 dB (ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC)spec
MIDI1 in, 1 out (5-pin DIN)spec
I/O2 XLR/TRS combo mic/line/Hi-Z plus 2 balanced line in, 4 outspec
#6

Focusrite Vocaster One

Focusrite · A solo host who does not want to set levels

The pick for a solo podcaster who wants the gear to get out of the way. If you record music as well as speech, a general-purpose interface with the same gain is the better buy.

Why it is here

  • `70 dB` of gain means any microphone on this site works without a booster
  • Auto Gain removes the single most common beginner mistake in one button press
  • Stereo loopback plus phone and camera connections, which is the actual podcast workflow

What it costs you

  • 24-bit / 48 kHz only, and no instrument input — it is a speech box and nothing else
  • The three Enhance presets are printed into the recording
  • One microphone input; a co-host means the Vocaster Two
Published specifications for the Focusrite Vocaster One, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain range70 dBspec
THD+N<= -94 dB at -1 dBFSspec
Conversion24-bit / 48 kHzspec
AutomationAuto Gain sets the level for youspec
LoopbackStereo loopback via Vocaster Hubspec
#7

Universal Audio Volt 2

Universal Audio · A hardware color option on the way in

Buy it if you want character on the way in and your mic is a condenser or a hot dynamic. With a low-output broadcast dynamic, 55 dB means a booster, and that changes the price comparison entirely.

Why it is here

  • Vintage mode is a real analog-style color, not a plug-in you could add later
  • Two combo inputs and a clean, legible front panel
  • The UA software bundle is worth actual money

What it costs you

  • 55 dB is the lowest gain ceiling in this group and the least SM7B-friendly
  • 112 dB dynamic range trails the Focusrite and MOTU converters
  • Vintage mode is a commitment printed into the recording
Published specifications for the Universal Audio Volt 2, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain55 dB availablespec
Dynamic range112 dB (A-weighted)spec
EIN-127 dBu (150 ohms, A-weighted)spec
Input impedance3 kohmsspec
VoicingVintage Mic Preamp Mode (UA 610 emulation)spec

What we did not pick, and why

  • The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4. The same 69 dB of gain plus MIDI and loopback, which makes it a step up inside the family rather than an alternative to it. It is ranked in best audio interfaces under $500.
  • The SSL 2+ MKII. 64 dB of gain, two headphone outputs and the 4K switch make it the right box for recording with someone else in the room, but it had no buyable listing when this page was written. SSL 2+ MKII vs Audient iD4 has the argument for when it returns.
  • The 16-bit floor. The M-Audio M-Track Duo and the Behringer UMC22 undercut everything here, and both convert at 16-bit. That is a real ceiling on quiet sources rather than a spec-sheet quibble — see are cheap audio interfaces worth it.
  • Anything that does not publish a gain figure. The UMC204HD and the UR22C are competent boxes with genuinely useful features, and neither manufacturer states a maximum mic gain. With a quiet dynamic that is a gamble, as UMC204HD vs Steinberg UR22C explains.
  • The Thunderbolt tier. Lower round-trip latency, several times the price, and no benefit at all to someone recording speech. Are Thunderbolt audio interfaces worth it is the honest answer.

Pair it with

  • A microphone the box can actually drive. If you are going down the gain ladder, go up the sensitivity ladder: best Rode PodMic alternatives ranks broadcast dynamics by output level, and three of them are hot enough for a 58 dB preamp.
  • A booster, if you are keeping a quiet microphone. Best preamps and boosters for the SM7B applies to any low-output dynamic, not only the Shure.
  • Monitors, through the balanced outputs. Every pick here has them and a laptop headphone jack does not — do I need an audio interface for studio monitors.
  • Cables that are not the weak link. Best XLR cables, including the honest answer about when the expensive one is worth it.
A desktop USB audio interface with gain knobs and an XLR input
Illustrative photography of the category, not of a specific model.

If you have already narrowed it to two boxes, the head-to-head pages finish the job faster than a ranking can. Scarlett 2i2 vs MOTU M2 is this page's top recommendation against its reference, Volt 2 vs Scarlett 2i2 is analog color against clean gain, and Elgato Wave XLR vs Scarlett 2i2 is the one to read if streaming is the job.

Questions people actually ask

Is the MOTU M2 better than the Scarlett 2i2?
On conversion and metering, yes: -129 dB EIN, 120 dB of output dynamic range and a front-panel meter you can read without alt-tabbing. On gain you cannot say, because MOTU does not publish a maximum mic-gain figure while Focusrite publishes 69 dB. With a condenser or a hot dynamic the M2 is the nicer box; with an SM7B the published number is worth more than the nicer box.
What is the cheapest decent Scarlett 2i2 alternative?
The Audient EVO 4, which gives you two mic preamps and automatic gain setting for less than the 2i2. The catch is 58 dB of gain, 11 dB short of the Focusrite and not enough for a low-output broadcast dynamic without a booster. Below the EVO 4 you are into 16-bit conversion, which is a different kind of compromise.
Which Scarlett 2i2 alternative has the most gain?
The Elgato Wave XLR, at a published 0 to 75 dB. It is a single-channel streaming box rather than a general-purpose interface, so you trade a second mic input and every line and instrument input for 6 dB more gain than the 2i2 and a tap-to-mute surface.
Is there a Scarlett 2i2 alternative with MIDI?
The MOTU M4 is the one to look at: MIDI in and out, 60 dB of published gain, MOTU's converters and two extra line inputs. The Arturia MiniFuse 2 is cheaper and also carries MIDI, but its 56 dB gain range makes it the wrong box for a quiet dynamic. UMC204HD vs MiniFuse 2 covers that end of the market.
Does any alternative have something like Air mode?
Not by that name, and the equivalents are not interchangeable. Air is a fixed analog voicing on the Focusrite input. The Universal Audio Volt 2's Vintage mode is a different and much more obvious color, and the SSL 4K switch is a top-end lift. All three are printed into the recording, so if you want to change your mind later, record clean and EQ in the DAW.
Will any of these fix a hissy recording on its own?
Only if the hiss is the preamp straining, which you can check in a minute: if the noise rises when you turn the gain up and your microphone is a quiet dynamic, more clean gain fixes it. If the noise is there at low gain, or the problem is boominess rather than hiss, the room is the fault and acoustic treatment is the purchase.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.