Skip to content
Mic & Mix

Audio-Technica AT2020 vs AT2035

The two condensers everyone starts with, separated by 8 dB of self-noise and one switch that matters more than the capsule.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

Audio-Technica AT2020 vs AT2035: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Audio-Technica AT2035The value condenser with the switches you actually need
Self-noise12 dB SPL8.1
2
Audio-Technica AT2020The entry condenser, if the budget is truly fixed
Self-noise20 dB SPL7.2
3
sE Electronics X1 SThe most on-mic control of any condenser here
Self-noise9 dB(A)8.3

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

Buy the AT2035. Its 12 dB SPL self-noise is 8 dB quieter than the AT2020's 20 dB SPL, it adds a switchable 80 Hz high-pass filter, and it ships with a real shockmount rather than a plastic clip — three concrete upgrades for a small price step. The AT2020 is the right choice only when the budget is genuinely fixed and the alternative is not recording at all.

This is one of the few comparisons on this site with an unambiguous answer, and it is worth saying plainly rather than manufacturing a dilemma. Both microphones are side-address cardioid condensers from the same manufacturer, aimed at the same buyer. Every published figure that differs between them favors the AT2035, and the two features it adds are precisely the two things a condenser in a home studio needs.

Published figures. Self-noise is the decisive column: it is the noise the microphone makes with nothing in front of it, and it sets the floor on a quiet take.
Audio-Technica AT2020Audio-Technica AT2035
TypeCardioid condenser, side-addressCardioid condenser, side-address
Self-noise20 dB SPL12 dB SPL
Sensitivity-37 dB-33 dB (22.4 mV)
Max SPL144 dB148 dB, or 158 dB with the pad
High-pass filterNoneSwitchable 80 Hz
PadNoneSwitchable -10 dB
Supplied mountPlastic stand clampShockmount

What 8 dB of self-noise sounds like

Self-noise is the hiss the microphone itself generates. 20 dB SPL is not loud in absolute terms, but it is a fixed floor under everything you record, and 8 dB is a large step on a logarithmic scale — roughly the difference between a noise floor you never think about and one you notice in every pause.

Where it bites hardest is voice-over and audiobook work, where long silences are part of the deliverable and a noise gate makes the hiss pump instead of removing it. It matters least on a loud, close-talked podcast voice, where your own level buries it. If your work is the first kind, the 8 dB alone justifies the step up; see best microphones for voice over.

The 80 Hz high-pass is the feature, not the capsule

If we could only keep one difference between these microphones, it would be the AT2035's switchable 80 Hz high-pass filter — and that is a genuinely unusual thing to say about a microphone comparison.

A condenser on a desk sits on top of a continuous low-frequency mess: traffic, HVAC, the building itself, your chair, footsteps upstairs, and the desk transmitting every keystroke into the stand. None of that is content and all of it eats headroom. Filtering it at the microphone means it never reaches the converter in the first place, which is categorically better than removing it later. The AT2020 has no such switch, so every bit of that rumble is recorded and has to be dealt with in the DAW.

The -10 dB pad is the less useful of the two switches for voice work — you are not going to approach 144 dB SPL talking. It earns its place if you also record a guitar amplifier or a drum.

Both microphones, and the one that beats them both

#1

Audio-Technica AT2035

Top pick

Audio-Technica · The value condenser with the switches you actually need

The condenser to buy if you are choosing on value: the high-pass filter and the 8 dB quieter noise floor are worth more in a real room than anything else in this price band. Skip it if you have not treated the room, in which case a dynamic is the better purchase.

Why it is here

  • 12 dB self-noise against the AT2020's 20 dB is an audible 8 dB of quiet for a small price step
  • The 80 Hz high-pass is the single most useful switch on a desk-mounted condenser
  • Ships with a real shockmount, not a plastic clip

What it costs you

  • Still a condenser, so the room rules apply
  • Slightly forward upper midrange that some voices find harsh
  • The 10 dB pad is mostly irrelevant for voice work
Published specifications for the Audio-Technica AT2035, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeCardioid condenser, side-addressspec
Self-noise12 dB SPLspec
Sensitivity-33 dB (22.4 mV) ref 1 V at 1 Paspec
Max SPL148 dB, or 158 dB with the padspec
ControlsSwitchable 80 Hz high-pass and 10 dB padspec
#2

Audio-Technica AT2020

Audio-Technica · The entry condenser, if the budget is truly fixed

Buy it only if the AT2035 is genuinely out of reach — the step up buys a high-pass filter and a quieter capsule, which are the two things that matter in an untreated room. On a fixed budget the money is better spent on a dynamic and a panel.

Why it is here

  • Cheapest credible XLR condenser, and it has been in production long enough to be a known quantity
  • -37 dB sensitivity drives easily from any interface
  • Light, so it works on a modest stand

What it costs you

  • 20 dB self-noise is 8 dB noisier than the AT2035 and audible on a quiet voice-over
  • No high-pass filter, so desk rumble goes straight into the take
  • Plastic stand mount rather than a shockmount
Published specifications for the Audio-Technica AT2020, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeCardioid condenser, side-addressspec
Self-noise20 dB SPLspec
Sensitivity-37 dBspec
Max SPL144 dBspec
#3

sE Electronics X1 S

sE Electronics · The most on-mic control of any condenser here

The best-specified condenser on this site for a real home studio: quieter than the Audio-Technicas and the only one with a choice of low-cut frequencies. Choose the AT4040 instead if you want a flatter, more forgiving top end.

Why it is here

  • `9 dB(A)` self-noise undercuts the AT2035 and AT4040 while costing less than the latter
  • **Two** low-cut frequencies rather than one — `160 Hz` is genuinely useful on a boomy voice in a small room
  • Two pad settings take it to `160 dB`, so it doubles as an instrument microphone

What it costs you

  • Brighter than the AT4040, which suits some voices and not others
  • Smaller dealer network than Audio-Technica or Rode
  • The switch count makes it easy to leave a filter engaged by accident
Published specifications for the sE Electronics X1 S, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Type1 inch true condenser, cardioidspec
Self-noise9 dB(A)spec
Sensitivity30 mV/Pa (-30.5 dBV)spec
Frequency range20 Hz - 20 kHzspec
Max SPL140 / 150 / 160 dB at 0 / 10 / 20 dB padspec
ControlsSwitchable -10 and -20 dB pads, 80 Hz or 160 Hz low-cutspec

The uncomfortable part: neither may be the right purchase

Both of these are condensers, and a cardioid condenser reproduces your room with the same enthusiasm it reproduces your voice. In a bedroom with bare drywall, a window and a hard floor, the loudest problem on your recording is not 20 dB of self-noise — it is the wall behind you arriving a few milliseconds after you do.

So before choosing between them, be honest about the room. If it is untreated, a broadcast dynamic will give you a cleaner-sounding result than either condenser for the same money: dynamic vs condenser microphones sets out why, and best XLR microphones under $100 is the shortlist. If you are committed to a condenser, two acoustic panels at the first reflection points will do more for your recordings than the step from the AT2020 to the AT2035.

If you can stretch past the AT2035

The sE Electronics X1 S is the better-specified microphone in every respect that matters here: 9 dB(A) self-noise, two low-cut frequencies (80 Hz and 160 Hz, the second genuinely useful on a boomy voice in a small room) and two pad settings. The step from the AT2035 to the X1 S buys more than the step from the AT2020 to the AT2035 does. Best condenser microphones for home studio ranks the whole field.

A side-address studio condenser microphone in a shockmount
Illustrative photography of the category.

What else you need

  • Phantom power. Both are condensers and need 48 V. Every interface on this site supplies it; a plain USB-to-XLR cable does not. XLR to USB adapters explained.
  • A pop filter. Neither has one built in, and a condenser at close range is less forgiving of plosives than a dynamic. Best pop filters.
  • A stand that does not transmit the desk. Particularly for the AT2020, which has no shockmount. Boom arm vs desk stand.

Questions people actually ask

Is the AT2035 worth the extra over the AT2020?
Yes, and it is one of the clearest value steps in home recording: 8 dB less self-noise, a switchable 80 Hz high-pass filter, a -10 dB pad and a real shockmount for a modest price increase.
What is the difference between the AT2020 and the AT2035?
Three things. Self-noise (20 dB SPL against 12 dB SPL), on-microphone switches (none against an 80 Hz high-pass and a -10 dB pad), and what is in the box (a plastic clamp against a shockmount). Both are side-address cardioid condensers.
Is the AT2035 good for podcasting?
Good in a treated room, risky in a bare one. A cardioid condenser picks up the room, so for podcasting in an untreated space a broadcast dynamic such as the Rode PodMic or an SM7B will produce a cleaner result. Best XLR microphones for podcasting ranks that field.
Does the AT2020 need phantom power?
Yes. Both the AT2020 and the AT2035 are condensers and require 48 V phantom power from an audio interface or a preamp.
Is the AT2035 better than the Rode NT1?
Quieter is not the same as better. The NT1 5th Generation's 4 dBA self-noise is far lower, but the AT2035 has the 80 Hz filter the NT1 lacks. AT2035 vs Rode NT1 is the full comparison.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.