Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best XLR Microphones Under $100

The cheapest tier where an XLR microphone is a real upgrade rather than a sideways move — ranked on the one spec that decides whether your interface can use it.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best XLR Microphones Under $100: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Rode PodMicThe best value in a broadcast dynamic
Sensitivity-57 dBV/Pa8.4
2
Elgato Wave DXA streaming dynamic that needs no booster
Sensitivity-52 dBV/Pa8.8
3
Shure SM58The cheapest way to hear what a dynamic does for you
Sensitivity-54.5 dBV/Pa8.5
4
Audio-Technica AT2020The entry condenser, if the budget is truly fixed
Self-noise20 dB SPL7.2

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The Rode PodMic is the pick under $100: -57 dBV/Pa of output, an internal pop filter and an internal shockmount in an all-metal body, which is a broadcast dynamic's entire feature set at the bottom of the price range. Buy the Elgato Wave DX instead if your interface is modest — at -52 dBV/Pa it is 5 dB hotter and the least likely of these four to need anything added.

This page exists because the $100 XLR tier is where most upgrades from a USB microphone actually happen, and because the usual advice for it is wrong. The question at this price is not which capsule sounds best in a treated vocal booth — none of these will be the limiting factor in a bedroom. The question is which one your existing interface can drive to a usable level without you buying a second box, and that is answered by published sensitivity, not by a review.

Published figures from each manufacturer. Sensitivity is the decisive column: a higher number, closer to zero, means a hotter microphone and less work for your preamp.
MicrophoneTypeSensitivityResponseBuilt in
Rode PodMicDynamic, cardioid-57 dBV/Pa20 Hz - 20 kHzPop filter and shockmount
Elgato Wave DXDynamic, cardioid-52 dBV/Pa50 - 15,000 HzPop filter
Shure SM58Dynamic, cardioid-54.5 dBV/Pa50 - 15,000 HzBall grille windscreen
Audio-Technica AT2020Condenser, cardioid-37 dBNot published as a toleranceNothing

Why sensitivity decides this page

A dynamic microphone has no electronics in it. Whatever voltage the capsule produces is all your preamp gets, and at this price that voltage is small. The published sensitivity figure tells you exactly how small: the PodMic's -57 dBV/Pa means a conversational voice at a hand's distance arrives at the interface roughly 60 dB below the level your DAW wants to see. Your interface has to make up the difference, quietly.

That is why the Wave DX ranks second here despite being the narrowest-bandwidth microphone on the page. At -52 dBV/Pa it is 5 dB hotter than the PodMic and 7 dB hotter than an SM7B, which in practice is the difference between a clean take on a 55 dB interface and a take with an audible hiss behind it. How much clean gain do you need does the arithmetic properly.

The AT2020's -37 dB looks dramatically better than all three dynamics, and it is — a condenser has a powered circuit inside it, so output level is simply not a problem. What you pay for that is room sensitivity, and in an untreated room that is a far worse trade than a hiss you can avoid by choosing a hotter dynamic.

The four, in order

Ranked on how likely each one is to produce a usable recording in an ordinary room on an ordinary interface — not on which capsule measures best in isolation.

#1

Rode PodMic

Top pick

Rode · The best value in a broadcast dynamic

The pick for most people upgrading from a USB mic: it gets you 90 percent of the broadcast-dynamic sound without the booster arithmetic. Choose the SM7B instead if your voice is already bass-heavy and you want the bass-rolloff switch.

Why it is here

  • At -57 dBV/Pa it needs about 2 dB less gain than an SM7B, which is enough to matter on a 58 dB interface
  • Internal pop filter means one less thing clamped to your arm
  • All-metal body at a fraction of the SM7B's price

What it costs you

  • Voiced with more low-mid weight than the SM7B, so a boomy voice can get boomier
  • No voicing switches, so you fix tone in the DAW rather than on the mic
  • Still low enough output that a 55 dB interface will be working hard
Published specifications for the Rode PodMic, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-57 dB re 1 V/Pa (1.60 mV at 94 dB SPL)spec
Frequency range20 Hz to 20 kHzspec
Output impedance320 ohmsspec
Built inInternal pop filter and internal shockmountspec
#2

Elgato Wave DX

Elgato · A streaming dynamic that needs no booster

The most sensible streaming dynamic if you want to plug into a modest interface and stop thinking about gain. If you also record music, the `15 kHz` ceiling is a real limit and a wider-band dynamic is the better buy.

Why it is here

  • At `-52 dBV/Pa` it is the hottest broadcast-style dynamic here — `7 dB` above an SM7B, so no interface on this site struggles
  • Internal pop filter, so nothing extra clamps to your arm
  • Light at `440 g`, which any arm holds comfortably

What it costs you

  • Response stops at `15 kHz`, so it is a speech microphone and not a music one
  • No voicing switches at all
  • Voiced for a close, forward streaming sound that is less neutral than an SM7B
Published specifications for the Elgato Wave DX, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity2.5 mV/Pa (-52 dBV/Pa)spec
Frequency response50 - 15,000 Hzspec
Impedance600 ohmsspec
Built inInternal pop filterspec
Weight440 gspec
#3

Shure SM58

Shure · The cheapest way to hear what a dynamic does for you

The right first XLR mic if the real question is whether a dynamic fixes your room, because it answers that for very little money on the interface you already own. It is a diagnostic, not a destination.

Why it is here

  • At -54.5 dBV/Pa it is the hottest dynamic here, and works on genuinely modest preamps
  • Light enough for any stand or arm you already own
  • Effectively indestructible, and resells for most of what you paid

What it costs you

  • Response stops at 15 kHz and it is voiced for a PA, not a studio
  • Handheld grille shape is awkward on a desk boom
  • You will outgrow it if voice is your main output
Published specifications for the Shure SM58, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-54.5 dBV/Pa (1.85 mV) at 1 kHzspec
Frequency response50 Hz to 15,000 Hzspec
Rated impedance150 ohmsspec
Net weight298 gspec
#4

Audio-Technica AT2020

Audio-Technica · The entry condenser, if the budget is truly fixed

Buy it only if the AT2035 is genuinely out of reach — the step up buys a high-pass filter and a quieter capsule, which are the two things that matter in an untreated room. On a fixed budget the money is better spent on a dynamic and a panel.

Why it is here

  • Cheapest credible XLR condenser, and it has been in production long enough to be a known quantity
  • -37 dB sensitivity drives easily from any interface
  • Light, so it works on a modest stand

What it costs you

  • 20 dB self-noise is 8 dB noisier than the AT2035 and audible on a quiet voice-over
  • No high-pass filter, so desk rumble goes straight into the take
  • Plastic stand mount rather than a shockmount
Published specifications for the Audio-Technica AT2020, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeCardioid condenser, side-addressspec
Self-noise20 dB SPLspec
Sensitivity-37 dBspec
Max SPL144 dBspec

The condenser trap at this price

The AT2020 is the microphone most often recommended under $100, and it is the one we rank last. Its 20 dB SPL self-noise is 8 dB noisier than the AT2035 one tier up, it has no high-pass filter, and it ships with a plastic clip rather than a shockmount — so desk rumble and keyboard noise go into the take with nothing on the microphone to stop them.

More importantly, a cardioid condenser picks up roughly as much of your room as it does of you. If your recording space is drywall, a desk and a window, the loudest problem on your recording will be the room, and no amount of capsule quality fixes that. Dynamic vs condenser microphones is the full argument. The short version for this price bracket: buy a dynamic, and spend the difference on acoustic treatment rather than on a quieter capsule.

Where each one stops being enough

  • The PodMic runs out of road when your voice is already bass-heavy. It is voiced with more low-mid weight than an SM7B and has no switches, so a boomy voice gets boomier and you fix it in the DAW. If that describes you, the SM7B's bass-rolloff switch is the reason to spend more.
  • The Wave DX stops at 15 kHz. For speech that is irrelevant; for singing or an acoustic instrument it is a real ceiling, and best microphones for acoustic guitar is the page you want instead.
  • The SM58 is voiced for a live PA and shaped to be held. On a desk boom the ball grille sits awkwardly and the response stops at 15 kHz. It is the best diagnostic purchase here, because it answers the question of whether a dynamic fixes your room for very little money, and the worst long-term one.
  • The AT2020 stops being enough the moment you notice its noise floor on a quiet passage, which on voice-over work is quickly. Best budget condenser microphones covers the next step up.

What you still have to budget for

  • An XLR cable. None of these ship with one. Best XLR cables covers what matters and what does not.
  • Something to hold it. A dynamic on a desk tripod picks up every keystroke through the desk. Boom arm vs desk stand is the decision; best boom arms is the shortlist.
  • An interface with enough gain. This is the one that breaks budgets. Best audio interfaces under $100 is honest about what the bottom of that category gives up, and are cheap audio interfaces worth it is the honest answer on whether to stretch.
  • Nothing else. No booster, no preamp, no shock mount, not at this tier. If your plan requires a $130 inline preamp to make a $99 microphone work, buy a hotter microphone instead.
A broadcast-style dynamic microphone on a desk boom arm in a home studio
Illustrative photography of the category.

The honest summary

Under $100 you are buying a dynamic microphone, and you are choosing between a slightly better voicing (PodMic) and slightly more output (Wave DX). Both are real upgrades on any USB microphone you are likely to own, for the same reason: they reject the room. Neither is the last microphone you will buy, and that is fine — a dynamic at this price holds its resale value better than almost anything else in a home studio.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best XLR microphone under $100?
The Rode PodMic, on the strength of -57 dBV/Pa output, an internal pop filter and an internal shockmount in an all-metal body. If your interface publishes less than about 58 dB of gain, the Elgato Wave DX at -52 dBV/Pa is the safer buy.
Is an XLR microphone under $100 better than a USB microphone?
In an untreated room, yes, though not because the capsule is better. A broadcast dynamic rejects room reflections and computer-fan noise far more effectively than the condenser capsule in most USB microphones, and that is audible on every take. Upgrading from USB to XLR covers the full cost of the move.
Do I need a Cloudlifter for a $100 XLR microphone?
You should not. A booster adds more than the microphone costs. If your interface cannot drive a -57 dBV/Pa dynamic cleanly, buy the hotter microphone — the Wave DX at -52 dBV/Pa or the SM58 at -54.5 dBV/Pa — rather than adding hardware. Cloudlifter vs FetHead explains when a booster is genuinely the right purchase.
Is the AT2020 a good first microphone?
Only in a quiet, treated room. Its 20 dB SPL self-noise is 8 dB above the AT2035's, it has no high-pass filter and no shockmount, and a condenser reproduces your room faithfully whether you want it to or not.
Can I use an SM58 for podcasting?
Yes, and it will sound better than most people expect. At -54.5 dBV/Pa it is one of the hottest dynamics here and it is effectively indestructible. The limits are a 15 kHz ceiling and a handheld grille that is awkward on a desk boom — see best XLR microphones for podcasting for the purpose-built alternatives.
Will any of these work with a Scarlett Solo?
All four, with the Wave DX and SM58 having the most headroom to spare. Focusrite does not publish a separate maximum gain figure for the Solo, so with the PodMic you are relying on there being enough — which there usually is for a close-talked voice, and may not be for a quiet one.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.