Skip to content
Mic & Mix

The Best Audio Interfaces for the Shure SM7B

At -59.0 dBV/Pa the SM7B is one of the quietest microphones sold. This page lists only the interfaces that publish enough gain to feed it without a booster.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

The Best Audio Interfaces for the Shure SM7B: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)The most gain per dollar in a two-input box
Max mic gain69 dB8.7
2
Elgato Wave XLRThe most gain of any single-channel box, built for streaming
Gain range0 to 75 dB8.6
3
Focusrite Vocaster OneA solo host who does not want to set levels
Mic gain range70 dB8.4
4
Rode RodeCaster Pro IIA multi-guest show with no engineer
Preamp gain76 dB9.1
5
Zoom PodTrak P4Four mics, four headphone outs, battery power
Preamp gain70 dB9.0
6
MOTU M4Four channels, MIDI and the best converters here
Max mic gain60 dB9.1

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) is the pick: 69 dB of published mic gain and 120 dB dynamic range, which clears the SM7B's -59.0 dBV/Pa with real headroom to spare and costs less than most of the alternatives. If you stream or record alone, the Elgato Wave XLR goes further at 75 dB and makes the gain question disappear entirely.

The SM7B is the most-recommended microphone in home recording and the one most often paired with an interface that cannot drive it. Its published sensitivity is -59.0 dBV/Pa, meaning 1.12 mV at 94 dB SPL — one of the quietest outputs of any microphone on sale. Feed that into a preamp whose ceiling is 55 dB and the result is a thin, hissy recording that sounds like a cheap microphone, which is exactly the complaint that fills forums.

Every interface on this page publishes a maximum mic-gain figure of 60 dB or more. That is the entire selection criterion, and it is a hard filter rather than a preference.

Published maximum mic gain and the margin each box leaves over the roughly `60 dB` an SM7B wants for a conversational voice at close range. Figures are the manufacturers' own.
InterfaceMax mic gainMargin over 60 dBMic inputsOther reasons to pick it
Rode RodeCaster Pro II76 dB+16 dB4-131.5 dBV EIN, six faders
Elgato Wave XLR75 dB+15 dB1Clipguard, tap-to-mute
Focusrite Vocaster One70 dB+10 dB1Auto Gain, loopback
Zoom PodTrak P470 dB+10 dB4Four headphone outs, battery power
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)69 dB+9 dB2120 dB dynamic range, cheapest here
MOTU M460 dB0 dB2-129 dBu EIN, MIDI, metering

Why 60 dB, and why the MOTU M4 is the marginal case

A voice at conversational level a hand's width from an SM7B produces roughly 1 mV at the XLR. Getting that to the level a DAW expects takes about 55 to 60 dB of gain for a projected voice, and more for a quiet one. You want headroom above that figure, not exactly that figure, because the last few decibels of any preamp's range are where its own noise becomes audible.

That is why the MOTU M4 sits at the bottom of this list despite having the best converters on it. 60 dB published is enough — the M4's -129 dBu EIN means what gain it has is very clean — but there is no margin. If your voice is soft or you prefer to sit further back, you will be at the top of the dial. MOTU M2 vs MOTU M4 covers why the M2 is harder to plan around still: MOTU publishes no maximum mic-gain figure for it at all.

  • Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) — the single most common SM7B pairing and a frequent source of disappointment. Focusrite publishes no separate maximum gain figure for the Solo, and it is the box people own when they ask why their SM7B hisses.
  • Audient iD4 MKII and iD14 MKII — 58 dB. Excellent preamps, -129 dB(A) EIN, and still 2 dB short of comfortable. Audient iD4 vs MOTU M2 covers the trade.
  • Universal Audio Volt 2 and Volt 276 — 55 dB. The lowest ceilings of any interface we recommend, and the least SM7B-friendly. Great with a condenser or a hot dynamic.
  • Audient EVO 4 — 58 dB, same story, with Smartgain doing nothing to create gain that is not there.
  • Behringer UMC204HD and Steinberg UR22C — neither manufacturer publishes a maximum gain figure, so pairing either with an SM7B is a gamble rather than a plan. Behringer UMC204HD vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is explicit about that.

None of those are bad interfaces. They are the wrong interfaces for this one microphone, and the difference matters because the usual workaround costs real money.

The six that clear the bar

Ranked on gain margin first, then on what else the box gives you. Every published figure comes from the manufacturer and is cited on each card.

#1

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)

Top pick

Focusrite · The most gain per dollar in a two-input box

The default answer for someone buying an SM7B or PodMic: it supplies enough clean gain that you never need a booster, which makes it the cheaper total purchase even when it is not the cheaper box. Look elsewhere only if you need MIDI or four outputs.

Why it is here

  • 69 dB is the most gain of any interface at this price, and enough for an SM7B with headroom to spare
  • 120 dB dynamic range means the converters are not the weak link
  • Two inputs, so a second person does not mean a second purchase

What it costs you

  • Air mode is a fixed voicing, not an EQ you can dial
  • Plastic-and-metal build feels less solid than the SSL or Audient competition
  • No MIDI, which matters if you also play keys
Published specifications for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen), with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain69 dBspec
Dynamic range120 dBspec
Inputs2 XLR/TRS combo with independent 48 Vspec
VoicingAir modespec
#2

Elgato Wave XLR

Elgato · The most gain of any single-channel box, built for streaming

The right box if you stream or record alone with a low-output dynamic and want the gain problem to simply not exist. It is not a general-purpose interface, and it is the wrong buy if you also record instruments.

Why it is here

  • `75 dB` of gain drives an SM7B with room to spare and no booster, which is the single most common streaming problem solved outright
  • Clipguard catches a shout that would otherwise clip the take
  • Capacitive tap-to-mute on the top surface, which is genuinely better than reaching for a key bind

What it costs you

  • One microphone input, so a co-host needs a second unit
  • The mixing lives in Elgato's software, so it is a Wave Link setup rather than a neutral interface
  • No MIDI, no line inputs, no instrument input
Published specifications for the Elgato Wave XLR, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Gain range0 to 75 dBspec
EIN-130 dBV at 60 dB gainspec
Dynamic range100 dB, or 120 dB with Clipguardspec
Phantom power+48 V at 7 mAspec
Conversion24-bit, 48 / 96 kHzspec
#3

Focusrite Vocaster One

Focusrite · A solo host who does not want to set levels

The pick for a solo podcaster who wants the gear to get out of the way. If you record music as well as speech, a general-purpose interface with the same gain is the better buy.

Why it is here

  • `70 dB` of gain means any microphone on this site works without a booster
  • Auto Gain removes the single most common beginner mistake in one button press
  • Stereo loopback plus phone and camera connections, which is the actual podcast workflow

What it costs you

  • 24-bit / 48 kHz only, and no instrument input — it is a speech box and nothing else
  • The three Enhance presets are printed into the recording
  • One microphone input; a co-host means the Vocaster Two
Published specifications for the Focusrite Vocaster One, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Mic gain range70 dBspec
THD+N<= -94 dB at -1 dBFSspec
Conversion24-bit / 48 kHzspec
AutomationAuto Gain sets the level for youspec
LoopbackStereo loopback via Vocaster Hubspec
#4

Rode RodeCaster Pro II

Rode · A multi-guest show with no engineer

The right purchase when you regularly record three or four people and post-production time is your real constraint. For one or two voices an interface plus a DAW does the same job for a fraction of the money.

Why it is here

  • 76 dB of gain and -131.5 dBV EIN means any microphone on this site works with room to spare
  • Six physical faders and onboard processing let one person run a four-person show live
  • Records multitrack to its own storage, so a laptop crash is not a lost episode

What it costs you

  • Far more money than an interface, and most of it buys features a solo host never uses
  • The onboard processing is a commitment unless you record raw tracks alongside
  • Big, and it owns your desk
Published specifications for the Rode RodeCaster Pro II, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Preamp gain76 dBspec
EIN-131.5 dBVspec
ChannelsNine assignable, six physical fadersspec
Recording24-bit fixed or 32-bit float WAV, or MP3spec
#5

Zoom PodTrak P4

Zoom · Four mics, four headphone outs, battery power

The best value in group podcast recording: four hot preamps and four headphone feeds is the whole job. Step up to the RodeCaster Pro II only if you need live mixing rather than multitrack capture.

Why it is here

  • 70 dB of gain feeds four SM7Bs, which nothing else at this price does
  • Four headphone outputs with individual level control — the actual bottleneck in group recording
  • Runs on AA batteries, so it records anywhere

What it costs you

  • No faders, no onboard EQ or compression
  • Only 2 channels reach the computer over USB, so live-streaming four separate mics is out
  • Plastic build and a small screen
Published specifications for the Zoom PodTrak P4, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Preamp gainUp to 70 dBspec
Channels4-channel recorderspec
Headphones4 independent headphone outputsspec
Computer use2-in / 2-out USB interfacespec
#6

MOTU M4

MOTU · Four channels, MIDI and the best converters here

The pick if you want MOTU's conversion plus MIDI and a couple of extra line inputs. If you only ever record one or two microphones and do not need MIDI, the M2 does the same job for less.

Why it is here

  • 60 dB of published gain and `-129 dBu` EIN is a genuinely quiet channel, and unlike the M2 the figure is published
  • MIDI in and out on a box this size saves a separate interface if you play keys
  • Full-color LCD metering for all four channels, which is more useful daily than any software mixer

What it costs you

  • 60 dB is enough for an SM7B but without much headroom to spare
  • Two of the four inputs are line-only, so it is not a four-microphone box
  • No onboard voicing or DSP at all
Published specifications for the MOTU M4, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
Max mic gain60 dBspec
Mic input EIN-129 dBuspec
Dynamic range120 dB (ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC)spec
MIDI1 in, 1 out (5-pin DIN)spec
I/O2 XLR/TRS combo mic/line/Hi-Z plus 2 balanced line in, 4 outspec

The booster route, and when it makes sense

An inline booster — a Cloudlifter CL-1, a FetHead, an SE DM1 — adds roughly 20 to 28 dB ahead of your preamp, which turns a 55 dB interface into enough for an SM7B. It is a real solution and sometimes the right one: if you already own the interface and like it, a booster is cheaper than replacing it.

What it is not is the cheaper path when you are buying both at once. A 69 dB interface plus an SM7B costs less than a 55 dB interface plus an SM7B plus a booster, and it is one fewer box, one fewer cable and one fewer thing depending on phantom power. Cloudlifter vs FetHead compares the boosters themselves, and best preamps for the Shure SM7B ranks that whole category.

What else to budget for

A desktop USB audio interface with gain knobs and an XLR input
Illustrative photography of the category.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best audio interface for the Shure SM7B?
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen): 69 dB of published mic gain and 120 dB dynamic range, which is 9 dB more gain than an SM7B needs for a conversational voice. For solo streaming, the Elgato Wave XLR at 75 dB.
How much gain does the SM7B need?
Roughly 55 to 60 dB for a projected voice at close range, and more for a quiet one, because its published sensitivity is -59.0 dBV/Pa (1.12 mV). Aim for an interface publishing 65 dB or more so the last few decibels of the dial are not where you live. How much gain does the SM7B need has the full calculation.
Can I use an SM7B with a Scarlett Solo?
Many people do, and many of them are the ones asking why their recordings hiss. Focusrite publishes no separate maximum gain figure for the Solo, so there is no number to plan against. The 2i2 publishes 69 dB and costs little more.
Do I need a Cloudlifter with the SM7B?
Only if your interface tops out below about 60 dB. With a 69 dB or 75 dB box you do not, and buying the right interface instead of a booster is cheaper when you are buying both at once.
Is the MOTU M2 enough for an SM7B?
Unclear from the specification, which is the problem: MOTU publishes -129 dB EIN for the M2 but no maximum mic-gain figure. The M4 publishes 60 dB. If you want a number you can check against the microphone, that is the one to buy.
Does the SM7B need phantom power?
No. It is a passive dynamic microphone. Phantom power is only relevant if you add an inline booster, which draws its power from the 48 V supply.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.