Skip to content
Mic & Mix

Shure SM7B vs Audio-Technica AT2020

The famous dynamic against the entry condenser. One needs 60 dB of gain you may not have; the other needs a room you probably do not have.

By Ryder M. · Published · How we score

Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes the ranking — how this site is funded.

Shure SM7B vs Audio-Technica AT2020: the picks compared on their decisive published specification, with our score for each.
#ProductKey specScorePrice
Top pick.1
Shure SM7BThe default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa8.4
$439.00View on Amazon

#ad How we earn · Price as of October 17, 2026

2
Audio-Technica AT2020The entry condenser, if the budget is truly fixed
Self-noise20 dB SPL7.2
$118.00View on Amazon

#ad How we earn · Price as of October 17, 2026

3
Audio-Technica AT2035The value condenser with the switches you actually need
Self-noise12 dB SPL8.1
$159.00View on Amazon

#ad How we earn · Price as of October 17, 2026

Rows link to the full write-up below. Prices come from Amazon and change without notice, so we link rather than print them — how we score.

Buy the Shure SM7B if your interface publishes 60 dB of clean gain or more and your room is untreated — its dynamic capsule rejects a reflective, noisy space in a way no condenser at any price matches. Buy the Audio-Technica AT2020 only if the budget is genuinely fixed; it is hotter by roughly 22 dB so any interface drives it, but its 20 dB SPL self-noise is the highest of any condenser on this site, and the AT2035 one rung up fixes that.

This is the comparison that shows up when somebody has an SM7B on a wishlist and an AT2020 in the basket, and the honest answer involves a third microphone. The AT2020 is not a bad capsule; it is the entry point of a range, and the next rung up improves the two figures that matter most for a small fraction of the gap to the Shure.

Published figures from each manufacturer, plus the AT2035 for context because it changes the decision. Sources below.
Shure SM7BAudio-Technica AT2020Audio-Technica AT2035
TypeDynamic, cardioidCardioid condenserCardioid condenser
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa-37 dB-33 dB (22.4 mV)
Self-noiseNot applicable20 dB SPL12 dB SPL
Max SPLNot a practical limit144 dB148 dB, 158 dB with the pad
On-mic controlsBass rolloff, presence boostNone80 Hz high-pass, 10 dB pad
Phantom powerNot requiredRequiredRequired
Room rejectionBest in categoryModerateModerate

The gain question, with numbers

The SM7B publishes -59.0 dBV/Pa. The AT2020 publishes -37 dB. The gap is roughly 22 dB, and that number is the practical difference between the two microphones for anyone buying their first interface alongside the capsule.

The AT2020 runs happily on anything with phantom power. The SM7B wants around 60 dB of clean gain for spoken word at a normal working distance; below that you are turning the preamp to its last few decibels, where its own noise floor becomes audible in every pause. A Scarlett 2i2 publishes 69 dB and clears it with room to spare; a 54 dB budget box does not clear it at all. How much clean gain do you need has the figure for every interface here.

If you already own a low-gain interface, the SM7B's real price is the microphone plus a booster — a FetHead at `27 dB`, or the SM7dB with +18 or +28 dB built into the body. That is not a reason to avoid it. It is a reason to total the bill before deciding the Shure is out of reach or the Audio-Technica is a bargain.

The AT2020's self-noise is the figure to look at twice

20 dB SPL is the highest self-noise figure of any condenser in this registry. In a loud, close application — a rap vocal, a shouted presentation — it is irrelevant, buried far under the source. On quiet material it is not: a softly delivered voice-over at a foot of distance sits close enough to it to hear a faint haze on the quiet parts.

The AT2035 publishes 12 dB SPL, an 8 dB improvement, and adds the 80 Hz high-pass and the 10 dB pad the AT2020 does not have. That is why this page carries three products rather than two: the cheaper Audio-Technica is rarely the right Audio-Technica. AT2020 vs AT2035 is the full version of that argument.

Room rejection, which the price tags hide

The specification sheets do not have a row for this and it is the most consequential difference between the two microphones. A dynamic capsule needs real air movement to generate a signal. A wall reflection arriving a few milliseconds later and several decibels down produces almost nothing from an SM7B and a clearly audible contribution from an AT2020.

In a treated room that is a feature: the condenser gives you detail and air the dynamic cannot. In a bare bedroom with a hard desk and a window, it is the reason home recordings sound like home recordings. Dynamic vs condenser microphones covers the mechanism, and treating a bedroom studio covers what it costs to change the answer.

Both microphones, and the one that usually wins instead

#1

Shure SM7B

Top pick

Shure · The default upgrade, if your preamp can feed it

Buy it if your interface supplies 60 dB or more of clean gain, or if you are budgeting for a booster alongside it. Buy something else if your only interface is a Scarlett Solo and you are not prepared to add hardware.

Why it is here

  • Rejects room and computer-fan noise better than any condenser at any price
  • Two voicing switches let one mic cover a thin voice and a boomy one
  • Internal shockmount and a yoke that actually holds position on a boom arm

What it costs you

  • At -59.0 dBV/Pa it is one of the quietest mics sold, so it demands a loud preamp
  • Total cost is the mic plus, very often, a booster
  • Heavy enough that a cheap desk arm will droop under it
Published specifications for the Shure SM7B, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeDynamic, cardioidspec
Sensitivity-59.0 dBV/Pa (1.12 mV)spec
Output impedance150 ohmsspec
Voicing controlsBass rolloff and presence boost switchesspec
#2

Audio-Technica AT2020

Audio-Technica · The entry condenser, if the budget is truly fixed

Buy it only if the AT2035 is genuinely out of reach — the step up buys a high-pass filter and a quieter capsule, which are the two things that matter in an untreated room. On a fixed budget the money is better spent on a dynamic and a panel.

Why it is here

  • Cheapest credible XLR condenser, and it has been in production long enough to be a known quantity
  • -37 dB sensitivity drives easily from any interface
  • Light, so it works on a modest stand

What it costs you

  • 20 dB self-noise is 8 dB noisier than the AT2035 and audible on a quiet voice-over
  • No high-pass filter, so desk rumble goes straight into the take
  • Plastic stand mount rather than a shockmount
Published specifications for the Audio-Technica AT2020, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeCardioid condenser, side-addressspec
Self-noise20 dB SPLspec
Sensitivity-37 dBspec
Max SPL144 dBspec
#3

Audio-Technica AT2035

Audio-Technica · The value condenser with the switches you actually need

The condenser to buy if you are choosing on value: the high-pass filter and the 8 dB quieter noise floor are worth more in a real room than anything else in this price band. Skip it if you have not treated the room, in which case a dynamic is the better purchase.

Why it is here

  • 12 dB self-noise against the AT2020's 20 dB is an audible 8 dB of quiet for a small price step
  • The 80 Hz high-pass is the single most useful switch on a desk-mounted condenser
  • Ships with a real shockmount, not a plastic clip

What it costs you

  • Still a condenser, so the room rules apply
  • Slightly forward upper midrange that some voices find harsh
  • The 10 dB pad is mostly irrelevant for voice work
Published specifications for the Audio-Technica AT2035, with the source for each figure.
SpecPublished valueSource
TypeCardioid condenser, side-addressspec
Self-noise12 dB SPLspec
Sensitivity-33 dB (22.4 mV) ref 1 V at 1 Paspec
Max SPL148 dB, or 158 dB with the padspec
ControlsSwitchable 80 Hz high-pass and 10 dB padspec

Where each one is clearly the right purchase

  • Podcast or voice work in an untreated room, interface publishing `60 dB` or more: SM7B, without hesitation.
  • First condenser, hard budget, quiet treated space, loud source: AT2020 — and look at the AT2035 before you commit.
  • Quiet voice-over material: neither at face value. The AT2020's 20 dB SPL floor is too high and the SM7B needs gain; see best microphones for voice over.
  • You want SM7B-style rejection on a cheap interface: a Rode PodMic at -57 dBV/Pa, which is 2 dB hotter than the Shure and far cheaper.

What neither microphone will fix

If your current recordings sound boomy, hollow or distant, the problem is the room, and a different capsule reproduces a bad room more or less faithfully rather than improving it. The SM7B reproduces less of it, which is a mitigation rather than a fix. Two panels at the first reflection points and a thick rug will do more for either microphone than swapping between them. Acoustic treatment on a budget is the cheap version of that.

A side-address studio condenser microphone in a shockmount
Illustrative photography of the category.

The short version: the SM7B is the better microphone and the harder purchase, the AT2020 is the easier purchase and the weaker microphone, and the AT2035 sitting between them is the reason this comparison rarely ends with either of the two in the title.

Questions people actually ask

Is the SM7B better than the AT2020?
Yes, clearly — better room rejection, two voicing switches, no self-noise figure to worry about. It also needs roughly 60 dB of clean gain and costs several times as much, so 'better' and 'the right purchase' are not the same question here.
How much gain does the AT2020 need?
Very little. At -37 dB it is roughly 22 dB hotter than the SM7B and works on any interface supplying phantom power, including the cheapest boxes on this site.
Is the AT2020's self-noise a problem?
On loud, close sources, no. On quiet material, yes — 20 dB SPL is the highest condenser self-noise figure in this registry, and it is audible as a faint haze under a soft voice-over. The AT2035 publishes 12 dB SPL instead.
Should I buy the AT2035 instead of the AT2020?
Usually, yes. For a small price step it improves self-noise by 8 dB, raises max SPL to 148 dB, and adds an 80 Hz high-pass and a 10 dB pad. AT2020 vs AT2035 has the detail.
Will an AT2020 sound good in an untreated room?
It will sound like your untreated room, faithfully. A condenser generates a usable signal from wall reflections that a dynamic largely ignores. If you cannot treat the space, a dynamic is the better choice regardless of price.
Do I need phantom power for either microphone?
For the AT2020, yes — it is a condenser. The SM7B is passive and needs none, unless you add an inline booster, which is itself phantom powered.

Sources

Every specification on this page traces to a published source. We have not tested these products — the ranking is a reading of published figures against our scoring criteria.